From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MgPAZ-0004qa-68 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:32:35 +0000 Received: by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix, from userid 207) id CD2FBE0740; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:41:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 824A8E0B68; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE13E0B68 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F0A672D4 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:56:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.018 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.018 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.419, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sAcpoVcCrdrz for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F0A67160 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:56:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Mg8gG-0006ao-Ly for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:56:12 +0200 Received: from athedsl-381660.home.otenet.gr ([79.131.42.218]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:56:12 +0200 Received: from realnc by athedsl-381660.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:56:12 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Masked package needs itsself ? Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 05:55:52 +0300 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: <20090826023245.GA5818@solfire> <20090826025229.GB5818@solfire> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-381660.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090815 Thunderbird/3.0b3 In-Reply-To: <20090826025229.GB5818@solfire> Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 2121d579-83d3-44d0-83a3-73c04cb964c8 X-Archives-Hash: 49ecc71b01c78aaab131ca8e471afcb9 On 08/26/2009 05:52 AM, meino.cramer@gmx.de wrote: >> Don't mask it. Install it, but also install media-libs/jpeg-compat >> alongside it so packages won't break. > > > it is also masked... Er, you need this package on your system. A lot of software depends on it. It's not optional. > Why I am urged via jpeg-7 to install maked package which will only > have no effect on non-masked package, when I install another masked > package? Sorry, I'm not following what you're trying to say :P