From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mh7aB-0001QW-70 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:57:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F7CFE07D7 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 01:07:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85286E0383 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:19:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35FE964317 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:19:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.964 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.964 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.365, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3JNRgQS9HkJP for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E5F64FC4 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Mfiop-0002qW-QI for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:19:19 +0200 Received: from pool-173-71-218-206.clppva.fios.verizon.net ([173.71.218.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:19:19 +0200 Received: from en.ABCD by pool-173-71-218-206.clppva.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:19:19 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: ABCD Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: warning: vmware workstation users should not use new 10.0 profile Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:18:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20090818235903.5ca59a35@dartworks.biz> <58965d8a0908240935i6b9af45ai1479994d8a17336a@mail.gmail.com> <20090824111908.15ecc20a@dartworks.biz> <58965d8a0908241205t3783f8f0padb80ab20e255e9@mail.gmail.com> <20090824133853.1e028c30@dartworks.biz> <58965d8a0908241411r58a55098l5b5fd56ccf399386@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-71-218-206.clppva.fios.verizon.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090702) In-Reply-To: <58965d8a0908241411r58a55098l5b5fd56ccf399386@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: cafd303c-e584-4aa2-aba7-790b6ecc54b1 X-Archives-Hash: ff69dfa978d194b5c3caf605f2420e3a -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Paul Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Keith Dart wrote: >> === On Mon, 08/24, Paul Hartman wrote: === >>> After switching to the 10.0 >>> profile, Xcb and other X-related things were emerged/upgraded, though, >>> and I ran xcb-rebuilder.sh and revdep-rebuild both of which found no >>> problems. >> === >> >> interesting. On my system some library named libxcb-xlib is used: >> >> >> 315 $ ldd /opt/vmware/workstation/lib/vmware/bin/vmware | grep xcb >> libxcb-xlib.so.0 => /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0 >> (0x00007ff7f67be000) >> >> But the new X libraries in 10.0 profile remove that file so it fails to >> dynamically link that library. >> >> Maybe I need to run the overlay... > > I've always been using vmware overlay, when new kernels and other > things that break vmware, it usually has a fixed version within a few > days. Right now I'm using vmware-modules 1.0.0.25 and > vmware-workstation 6.5.3.185404. > > $ ldd /opt/vmware/workstation/lib/vmware/bin/vmware | grep xcb > libxcb.so.1 => /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1 (0x00007f7de0aac000) > > Seems vmware has updated it in the newer version. > > Just because ldd reports a library doesn't mean that there is a hard dependency on that library. If ../bin/vmware links against libX11.so.6, but not libxcb*, and libX11.so.6 is linked against libxcb-xlib.so.0, then ldd will report libxcb-xlib.so.0, because it is an indirect dependency. To find direct dependencies, you can use `scanelf -qF '#F%n' /path/to/file`, which will output a comma-separated list of libraries (for instance, "libxcb.so.1,libdl.so.2,libc.so.6"). - -- ABCD -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkqTH98ACgkQOypDUo0oQOoX8QCcCbmyWpDdzL7KpjYsK2togFFa 4qUAoLJAh64H0hOYQtyR8w4L8iIChhiy =93An -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----