From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MdrqS-0002XX-Cx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:33:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EC43E03E5; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:33:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C0CE03E5 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:33:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860B9651CE for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:33:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.05 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.05 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.451, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RnGOrthIehQl for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:33:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F7E64DE3 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:33:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MdrqE-00083W-Lc for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 22:33:06 +0200 Received: from athedsl-373504.home.otenet.gr ([79.131.10.254]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 22:33:06 +0200 Received: from realnc by athedsl-373504.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 22:33:06 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 and x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3 still linked to libpython2.5.so.1.0 after upgrading to python-2.6.2-r1 Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:32:53 +0300 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: <20090819211356.0bf8fb1e@mpismpirikos.tolises.homeunix.org> <20090819231721.104e44eb@mpismpirikos.tolises.homeunix.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-373504.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090815 Thunderbird/3.0b3 In-Reply-To: <20090819231721.104e44eb@mpismpirikos.tolises.homeunix.org> Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 8a6f267e-c0de-46c6-a47b-a0e193802b7f X-Archives-Hash: 20c153cf893ee8bff33697e4b2af2212 On 08/19/2009 11:17 PM, Yiannis wrote: > On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:30:56 +0300 > Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > >> On 08/19/2009 09:13 PM, Yiannis wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Recently I upgraded to python-2.6.2-r1 which currently is slotted on >>> my system as long as python-2.5.4-r3 is. After running >>> python-upgrade twice I see that dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 and >>> x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3 are still linked to libpython2.5.so.1.0. On >>> the other hand emege --depclean -p suggests that python-2.5.4-r3 >>> can be removed and this is what I would like to do if possible. >>> Shouldn't python-upgrade have resolved this linking issue? From the >>> afore mentioned ebuilds I can tell that there is no specific >>> dependency on python 2.5. Any help would be appreciated. >> >> That's what revdep-rebuild is for. After depclean removes >> python-2.5, you need to do a revdep-rebuild which will take care of >> boost and any other packages still using the old libpython. > > I am a little confused here about what happened. After removing > python-2.5.4-r3, # revdep-rebuilt -pv --library libpython2.5.so.1.0 did > not rebuild dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 nor > x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3. Also running: > # for file in `equery files vte`; do if [ -f $file ]; then ldd $file | > grep python; fi; done 2>/dev/null > # for file in `equery files boost`; do if [ -f $file ]; then ldd $file > | grep python; fi; done 2>/dev/null > returns nothing about python(I suppose that revdep-rebuild does > something like this). Everything seems ok. Am I missing something here? What about just "revdep-rebuild -a" without any other options? Also, what portage version do you have? If it's 2.2, it should have the new "preserved-rebuild" feature which keeps libs even if you depclean. If yes, I can't really help, I'm on portage 2.1.