From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 and x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3 still linked to libpython2.5.so.1.0 after upgrading to python-2.6.2-r1
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:32:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <h6hnhg$li8$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090819231721.104e44eb@mpismpirikos.tolises.homeunix.org>
On 08/19/2009 11:17 PM, Yiannis wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:30:56 +0300
> Nikos Chantziaras<realnc@arcor.de> wrote:
>
>> On 08/19/2009 09:13 PM, Yiannis wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Recently I upgraded to python-2.6.2-r1 which currently is slotted on
>>> my system as long as python-2.5.4-r3 is. After running
>>> python-upgrade twice I see that dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 and
>>> x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3 are still linked to libpython2.5.so.1.0. On
>>> the other hand emege --depclean -p suggests that python-2.5.4-r3
>>> can be removed and this is what I would like to do if possible.
>>> Shouldn't python-upgrade have resolved this linking issue? From the
>>> afore mentioned ebuilds I can tell that there is no specific
>>> dependency on python 2.5. Any help would be appreciated.
>>
>> That's what revdep-rebuild is for. After depclean removes
>> python-2.5, you need to do a revdep-rebuild which will take care of
>> boost and any other packages still using the old libpython.
>
> I am a little confused here about what happened. After removing
> python-2.5.4-r3, # revdep-rebuilt -pv --library libpython2.5.so.1.0 did
> not rebuild dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 nor
> x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3. Also running:
> # for file in `equery files vte`; do if [ -f $file ]; then ldd $file |
> grep python; fi; done 2>/dev/null
> # for file in `equery files boost`; do if [ -f $file ]; then ldd $file
> | grep python; fi; done 2>/dev/null
> returns nothing about python(I suppose that revdep-rebuild does
> something like this). Everything seems ok. Am I missing something here?
What about just "revdep-rebuild -a" without any other options?
Also, what portage version do you have? If it's 2.2, it should have the
new "preserved-rebuild" feature which keeps libs even if you depclean.
If yes, I can't really help, I'm on portage 2.1.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-19 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-19 18:13 [gentoo-user] dev-libs/boost-1.35.0-r2 and x11-libs/vte-0.17.4-r3 still linked to libpython2.5.so.1.0 after upgrading to python-2.6.2-r1 Yiannis
2009-08-19 18:30 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2009-08-19 18:41 ` Yiannis
2009-08-19 20:17 ` Yiannis
2009-08-19 20:32 ` Nikos Chantziaras [this message]
2009-08-19 21:12 ` Yiannis
2009-08-19 22:50 ` pk
2009-08-20 19:06 ` Roger Cahn
2009-08-20 23:07 ` Yiannis
2009-08-21 10:21 ` Roger Cahn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='h6hnhg$li8$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=realnc@arcor.de \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox