public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user]  Re: Gcc 4.3.4 ---> 4.4.1
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 21:52:15 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <h6704o$knl$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A86FFF9.5090001@gmail.com>

On 08/15/2009 09:35 PM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>
>>
>> AFAIK, the mudflap pointer checker is just a command line GCC switch.
>> You need to enable it explicitly using "-fmudflap".
>>
>
> ah.... o.k. I'm using the hardened overlay, and mudflap is a use flag
> defaulting to enabled. I'll post that second comment over in hardened.

I'm not on hardened, but mudflap is enabled by default here too.  What I 
don't know is whether hardened has "-fmudflap" enabled by default. 
Perhaps someone who knows more about this feature can shed some light on 
how this works exactly.


> I'd guess that most here would appreciate it if you post your
> impressions about graphite.

Overall system performance seems unchanged.  I would need to actually 
benchmark it.  I didn't do it yet, but you could emerge stuff like gzip, 
bzip2, oggdec (and other stuff that is easy to benchmark) with 4.4.1, 
run them on in-memory files (that means in /dev/shm) and time them (with 
the 'time' command) to see how big a gain there is.  For example:

   time bzip2 --best /dev/shm/500gb-test-file




  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-15 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-14 23:17 [gentoo-user] Gcc 4.3.4 ---> 4.4.1 felix
2009-08-14 23:29 ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2009-08-15  0:33   ` felix
2009-08-15  0:43     ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-08-15 16:48       ` Mark Knecht
2009-08-15 16:59         ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-08-15 17:07       ` 7v5w7go9ub0o
2009-08-15 17:39         ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-08-15 18:35           ` 7v5w7go9ub0o
2009-08-15 18:52             ` Nikos Chantziaras [this message]
2009-08-15 18:57               ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-08-15 15:50     ` Alan McKinnon
2009-08-15 16:42       ` Mark Knecht
2009-08-15 16:49         ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-08-15 17:10           ` Mark Knecht
2009-08-15 17:06         ` Dirk Heinrichs
2009-08-15 17:18           ` Mark Knecht
2009-08-15 17:28             ` Alan McKinnon
2009-08-15 17:24           ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-08-15 17:37             ` Dirk Heinrichs
2009-08-15 17:40               ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-08-16 12:43               ` Alan McKinnon
2009-08-15 17:25           ` Alan McKinnon
2009-08-15 17:39             ` Dirk Heinrichs
2009-08-15 17:17         ` Alan McKinnon
2009-08-15  7:22 ` [gentoo-user] " Neil Bothwick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='h6704o$knl$1@ger.gmane.org' \
    --to=realnc@arcor.de \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox