From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MVYAC-0003En-K4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:55:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68A05E05D9; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49146E05EB for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACE766EE1 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:55:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.483 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.483 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.116, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id osYcppcPpEd9 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:55:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF0566EFD for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MVY9v-0001IL-Hv for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:55:04 +0000 Received: from pool-173-71-218-206.clppva.fios.verizon.net ([173.71.218.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:55:03 +0000 Received: from en.ABCD by pool-173-71-218-206.clppva.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:55:03 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: ABCD Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: cloning + upgrade howto? Followup-To: gmane.linux.gentoo.user Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:51:18 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20090723080924.2e730943@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> <4A686729.4040103@anferny.me.uk> <20090723153619.4e197704@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> <4A6D6661.6040204@anferny.me.uk> <20090727100533.1a5da289@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> <20090727224655.5a886b5e@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-71-218-206.clppva.fios.verizon.net User-Agent: KNode/4.4 pre Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 89b89c36-7906-48fa-a4a0-8c1a997dafd8 X-Archives-Hash: 395ce42a6710d2c8ec74f48036e234cc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:39:27 -0400, ABCD wrote: > >> > It should, unless you are woefully out of date. > >> Not true: the versions of portage that support sets (including @world) >> are all hardmasked currently. > > Still? I unmasked them ages ago, but though that had all been sorted out > by now. But yes, sets are about the only recent portage feature not > supported by the stable version, my bad. > I believe the mask is still in place because of a couple issues with sets, as well as issues with FEATURES=preserve-libs. - -- ABCD -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkpuIVYACgkQOypDUo0oQOpGUQCfWsKt5U5eTEVP4d7jFyGJovYS +SoAmgM1wW3lDgsgagNezODCSfcR/GiA =/dA2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----