From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MO12W-0002Cr-9p for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:08:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7982E0764; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 03:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996BDE0764 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 03:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E26365B0E for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 03:08:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.522 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.077, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ju5zSEaZNMqs for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 03:08:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368DD65795 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 03:08:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MO12C-0002cd-9I for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:07:56 +0000 Received: from pool-173-71-218-206.clppva.fios.verizon.net ([173.71.218.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:07:56 +0000 Received: from en.ABCD by pool-173-71-218-206.clppva.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:07:56 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: ABCD Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: qt blocks, poppler, etc. Followup-To: gmane.linux.gentoo.user Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:07:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: <7bef1f890907041914l5af5e3bdm8317021ef5b34bba@mail.gmail.com> <200907051042.48031.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-71-218-206.clppva.fios.verizon.net User-Agent: KNode/4.4 pre Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 15f72a2f-17bb-47bc-959e-265e39cc207c X-Archives-Hash: e38f1a9a9d2b479ed2d981b671c1bcb1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alan McKinnon wrote: > First, unmask portage. The maintainer masked the 2.2_rc versions so that > 2.1.6* could get more testing. portage-2.2 can automatically resolve those > blockers so you don't have to. Actually, the latest 2.1.6.* versions contain the same auto-resolution for blockers that 2.2_rc* does, as the only difference between 2.1.6.* and 2.2_rc* is that 2.2_rc* has support for sets and preserved-libs: everything else has been backported (actually, the 2.1.6 codebase was forked off of 2.2, then the support for those two features was removed). - -- ABCD -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkpSu/cACgkQOypDUo0oQOqANQCfc5ePxReiIU79FXXUuOCLcvuK DmoAoMA7/fba56fTha1bM9z0US4sRe6I =2bTT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----