From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lqkdo-0006jE-Gs for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:57:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DF84E05BF; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:57:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA16E05BF for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:57:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271EC65202 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:57:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.438 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.438 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.161, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0B5q58yzmmcE for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:57:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81547653C7 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:57:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LqkdY-0002OU-SH for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:57:01 +0000 Received: from athedsl-48552.home.otenet.gr ([87.203.166.246]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:57:00 +0000 Received: from realnc by athedsl-48552.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:57:00 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: GCC-4.3.2 Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 11:56:57 +0300 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: <1238747642.49d5c9fa80017@imp.free.fr> <20090406060221.GH6904@syscon4.inet> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-48552.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) In-Reply-To: <20090406060221.GH6904@syscon4.inet> Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: ca063846-c671-482a-91df-b345b49fee9f X-Archives-Hash: 8ab640e9c0174d3db57689491b72b77c Joseph wrote: > On 04/03/09 10:34, alain.didierjean@free.fr wrote: >> Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and >> performed "emerge system" ? >> What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell... >> >> -- >> ~adj~ > > I just notice that there is a problem with CFLAGS -march=native on AMD64 > I recompile my system using this new flag and have a lot of problems. an > examples new xorg-server-1.5... would not compile, I switch back to my > previous settings: > -march=athlon64 and it compiled on first pass. > So, now I'm recompiling the system with my old flag: -march=athlon64 :-/ -march=native is only useful if you don't know what to use. I guess most Gentoo users do know what to use. Why should I use "native" if I know that my CPU is "athlon64" :P