From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LYpBH-0003NJ-S1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:09:44 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8E66E0141; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0662E0141 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3B8B4EA4 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:09:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.419 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.419 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.180, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ufTik2mMPB0A for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:09:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C249B4E5D for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:09:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LYpB5-0006bF-U9 for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:09:31 +0000 Received: from athedsl-61502.home.otenet.gr ([87.203.217.140]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:09:31 +0000 Received: from realnc by athedsl-61502.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:09:31 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: NIC not detected after Kernel upgrade Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:09:24 +0200 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: <865773ce0902151331y6c694eecm8625993dd9bd32a5@mail.gmail.com> <20090215165040.45fe1b03@t61.localhost> <865773ce0902151354x5bceb4cfyb9fbf4771ba74b68@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-61502.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090215) In-Reply-To: <865773ce0902151354x5bceb4cfyb9fbf4771ba74b68@mail.gmail.com> Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 5a3b042a-597b-4602-bbf6-242549eb6b74 X-Archives-Hash: 26be942973b9458c935afbdf16dd9271 Guillermo Garron wrote: > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Kenneth Prugh wrote: >> I think you need just E1000E for your NIC. >> >> I use E1000E <*> for my intel: >> >> 00:19.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82566MM Gigabit Network >> Connection (rev 03) > Hi, > > I think that is the one I should use! cause it seems I have the same card. > > I will try and let you know. e1000 is for the PCI version. e1000e is for the PCI Express version. It can be that there's a conflict if both are enabled.