From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LUWSI-0001N1-RI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:21:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A32F3E01E0; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 01:21:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFF6E01E0 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 01:21:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E83864543 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 01:21:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.453 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.453 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.146, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AP+9vaP8uLNG for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 01:21:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016B364537 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 01:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LUWRy-0003Qb-08 for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:21:10 +0000 Received: from athedsl-407915.home.otenet.gr ([79.131.145.105]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:21:09 +0000 Received: from realnc by athedsl-407915.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:21:09 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Different servers behind the same router Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:21:17 +0200 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: <20090203174321.GA30119@revolver> <20090203183516.GA30510@revolver> <20090204061308.47e55fcb@coercion> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-407915.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090203) In-Reply-To: <20090204061308.47e55fcb@coercion> Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 1056d5bc-128f-4124-af49-d3a6e3796094 X-Archives-Hash: 3c5bdd118fa9d9a2fe0b635ac1cdacb3 Mike Kazantsev wrote: > On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:36:55 +0200 > Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > >> Since your ISP offers you the option to have two different IP, yes that >> the best choice. Over here I would have to pay quite some money to get >> an extra IP. So you're lucky I guess. > > There is plenty of address space on IPv6. One can set up a tunnel, if > ISP doesn't provide it yet. > After that, it's as simple as enabling forwarding in kernel and opening > a FORWARD chain, and you can have 64+ bits of real addresses behind it, > no translation or port forwarding. > > And teredo (in form of miredo daemon) offers ability to access IPv6 > from anywhere (like public hotspots) w/o setting up any tunneling. > > Of course, it's not much use for public server, but certainly useful > for ssh (among over things) to networks behind nat. I can't say I understood what you said, but the majority of ISPs give clients v4 IPs? Mine for example right now (it's dynamic) is 79.123.149.101. That's the only way to reach me from WAN.