From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-90186-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1LTtBG-00014k-Fv
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 07:25:18 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE760E0667;
	Mon,  2 Feb 2009 07:25:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76036E0667
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2009 07:25:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137C3646DC
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2009 07:25:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -3.573
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.573 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.026,
	BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id ZmLLDJ8shXib for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Mon,  2 Feb 2009 07:25:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B508A64594
	for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2009 07:25:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LTtB3-0000ls-ED
	for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 07:25:06 +0000
Received: from pool-173-71-204-106.clppva.fios.verizon.net ([173.71.204.106])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 07:25:05 +0000
Received: from en.ABCD by pool-173-71-204-106.clppva.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 07:25:05 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From:  ABCD <en.ABCD@gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user]  Re: When did bzImage move?
Date:  Mon, 02 Feb 2009 02:24:55 -0500
Message-ID: <gm6748$492$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:  <49850BBC.9060302@gmail.com> <200902010347.51639.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> <498614F3.6070208@konstantinhansen.de> <5bdc1c8b0902011337u5b4b4c66j5fcbcc3db779ae8b@mail.gmail.com> <49861C4D.6010505@gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b0902011508k1f8f710cm950c0daf7f520651@mail.gmail.com> <20090202010543.304d836f@krikkit> <6F28BC94-47F2-4B41-A9ED-D025AF28FC57@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <49866CA8.3000402@gmail.com> <7F4020A9-862B-4ACE-B6DC-C383CA5D873C@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <49867D33.7000506@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-71-204-106.clppva.fios.verizon.net
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090106)
In-Reply-To: <49867D33.7000506@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: d80b6d83-43f9-4f51-8471-d94a4db8d99b
X-Archives-Hash: 5ca462b2ff9df3ebffbdfac475eb560c

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dale wrote:
> Stroller wrote:
>> On 2 Feb 2009, at 03:46, Dale wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>> I think I tried this &/or genkernel & when I looked at /boot I found
>>>> they'd littered the place with clutter.
>>>>
>>>> I hope you won't be offended, but the amount of junk files this added
>>>> made me want to barf.
>>>>
>>>> I have avoided any such "complications" since, considering I don't
>>>> consider copying a file & editing grub.conf to be anything of a
>>>> complication myself.
>>>> ...
>>> I think I read somewhere that system.map file is no longer needed,
>>> unless you want to set up things in a "odd" way.  Is that correct?
>> I've certainly never needed it, in several years since 2.4 kernels.
>> But IIRC it is/was copied over when using these "automated kernel
>> installation methods".
>>
>> Stroller.
>>  
> 
> I think that is how mine got there to.  I may rename mine and reboot and
> see what blows up. 
> 
> Dale
> 
> :-)  :-) 
> 
> 

If I remember correctly, it is only used by depmod, and only if you pass
the file name on the command line. update-modules, which calls depmod,
and tends to be the main way that depmod is called (besides in the
kernel Makefile), searches the following directories for the System.map
file:
  /lib/modules/${KV}/build
  /usr/src/linux-${KV}
  /lib/modules/${KV}
  /boot
  /usr/src/linux

In each directory, it looks for the file in this order:
  System.map-genkernel-${arch}-${KV}
  System.map-genkernel-*-${KV}
  System.map-${KV}
  System.map

What this effectively means is that the copy in /boot is a backup copy,
just in case you clean the current build of your kernel
(/lib/modules/${KV}/build is a symlink to the build directory of your
kernel build, which can differ from the source directory)

tl;dr version: It won't blow up immediately, but you might run into
problems later if you `make clean` or `make mrproper` in the build tree
- - or build a different kernel in the same tree.

- --
ABCD
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkmGn8YACgkQOypDUo0oQOqZFgCffggirZ6KATIY/WcMwRxFz9O5
4BMAniHaPafRfEb6dhE1YXsfVUKJKLo2
=MqG6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----