[gentoo-user] localmount before fsck: e2fsck complaining

[gentoo-user] localmount before fsck: e2fsck complaining

[reQuiem23]

hi all,

i just noticed some warnings in my bootup process. the order of the services
in question is checkfs - localmount - fsck. however, checkfs does the
pending file system checks already before the partitions are mounted, so why
is there another service "fsck" which seems to do just the same? especially
because my /home partition is already mounted by localmount when fsck
starts, which is sort of a problem.

Greetings,
Niklas

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/localmount-before-fsck%3A-e2fsck-complaining-tp21774767p21774767.html
Sent from the gentoo-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[gentoo-user] Re: localmount before fsck: e2fsck complaining

[ABCD]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

reQuiem23 wrote:
> hi all,
> 
> i just noticed some warnings in my bootup process. the order of the services
> in question is checkfs - localmount - fsck. however, checkfs does the
> pending file system checks already before the partitions are mounted, so why
> is there another service "fsck" which seems to do just the same? especially
> because my /home partition is already mounted by localmount when fsck
> starts, which is sort of a problem.
> 
> Greetings,
> Niklas
> 

It seems that you have a mixture of baselayout1 and baselayout2/openrc
scripts installed simultaneously, which can cause all kinds of problems
- - the service "checkfs" does not exist in baselayout2/openrc, and so can
be deleted (the reason it was not deleted is *probably* because it had
been edited at some point, and was therefore under CONFIG_PROTECT).  You
may also be having other problems due to this, but that's the most
obvious that I can see from your description.

- --
ABCD
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkmGm9IACgkQOypDUo0oQOqG5gCgwHEBX0rrOIOg0xow/cY/9aTw
OVoAn1dmuy5NMq7EcN6Z2UEHh9wCUfsM
=V+2S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [gentoo-user] localmount before fsck: e2fsck complaining

[reQuiem23]

Bugzilla from en.ABCD@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> reQuiem23 wrote:
>> hi all,
>> 
>> i just noticed some warnings in my bootup process. the order of the
>> services
>> in question is checkfs - localmount - fsck. however, checkfs does the
>> pending file system checks already before the partitions are mounted, so
>> why
>> is there another service "fsck" which seems to do just the same?
>> especially
>> because my /home partition is already mounted by localmount when fsck
>> starts, which is sort of a problem.
>> 
>> Greetings,
>> Niklas
>> 
> 
> It seems that you have a mixture of baselayout1 and baselayout2/openrc
> scripts installed simultaneously, which can cause all kinds of problems
> - - the service "checkfs" does not exist in baselayout2/openrc, and so can
> be deleted (the reason it was not deleted is *probably* because it had
> been edited at some point, and was therefore under CONFIG_PROTECT).  You
> may also be having other problems due to this, but that's the most
> obvious that I can see from your description.
> 
> - --
> ABCD
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAkmGm9IACgkQOypDUo0oQOqG5gCgwHEBX0rrOIOg0xow/cY/9aTw
> OVoAn1dmuy5NMq7EcN6Z2UEHh9wCUfsM
> =V+2S
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> 
> 

hallo, thank you very much for the answer. i wouldn't now why checkfs should
have been in CONFIG_PROTECT, because i have never touched it, but it is true
that i had to update my openrc/baselayout. when i remove checkfs, though, it
would not solve the problem of localmount being run before fsck, would it?
the mounted /home part could still not be scanned, i suppose. am i wrong
here?

Greetings,
Niklas
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/localmount-before-fsck%3A-e2fsck-complaining-tp21774767p21789277.html
Sent from the gentoo-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [gentoo-user] localmount before fsck: e2fsck complaining

[Dirk Heinrichs]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 290 bytes --]

Am Montag, 2. Februar 2009 14:03:29 schrieb reQuiem23:

> when i remove checkfs, though, it
> would not solve the problem of localmount being run before fsck, would it?

Sure it would.

> the mounted /home part could still not be scanned, i suppose. am i wrong
> here?

Yes.

Bye...

	Dirk

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] localmount before fsck: e2fsck complaining

[reQuiem23]

Dirk Heinrichs-2 wrote:
> 
> Am Montag, 2. Februar 2009 14:03:29 schrieb reQuiem23:
> 
>> when i remove checkfs, though, it
>> would not solve the problem of localmount being run before fsck, would
>> it?
> 
> Sure it would.
> 
>> the mounted /home part could still not be scanned, i suppose. am i wrong
>> here?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> Bye...
> 
> 	Dirk
> 
>  
> 

Okay, I'll give it a try.

Greetings,
Niklas
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/localmount-before-fsck%3A-e2fsck-complaining-tp21774767p21790952.html
Sent from the gentoo-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.