From: Grant Edwards <grante@visi.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: No /dev entries in recent stage3 snapshots?
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:29:00 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <glgf8s$7s5$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090124232911.660b597b@krikkit
On 2009-01-24, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:55:10 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>
>> I have a server running that hets that null/console missing
>> message every boot - and it does not hurt it at any way.
>
> A missing /dev/console stops the boot process here. It boots
> without /dev/null, but only after udev spews out a load of
> messages.
Ah, not to worry: I've been assured in the gentoo forum thread
that the problems we see when the root filesystem doesn't have
proper /dev/null and /dev/console nodes aren't really
happening:
Neither /dev/null nor /dev/console are needed at boot-time,
therefore their absence doesn't cause problems.
[You must admit the argument is flawless -- though I still
question the premise.]
In order to get rid of my problems that weren't happening, I
initially tried the "mount -bind" and "cp -a" commands that
show up in /etc/issue when your /dev directory is hosed. That
didn't help: after setting /etc/issue back to the default file
and rebooting all the same problems still weren't happening
(and /etc/issue was again modified to tell me to do mount -bind
and cp -a to fix them).
Then I tried booting with root in rw mode and init=/bin/bash
and then doing a MAKEDEV generic-i386. (I found that recipe in
an old mailing list somewhere.) MAKEDEV complained a lot about
not being able to read /proc/devices. When I rebooted, I still
had the all same problems not happening as before.
I finally booted from a minimal install CD, mounted my root
partition, removed its /dev directory completely and then
re-created it by untaring ./dev from a good stage3 tarball. Now
the system boots up smoothly. I feel like a bit of a fool
expending so much effort getting rid of problems that weren't
happening -- but, now the problems that weren't happening are
gone, so I'm happy.
;)
--
Grant
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-25 1:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-21 4:04 [gentoo-user] No /dev entries in recent stage3 snapshots? Grant Edwards
2009-01-21 5:42 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2009-01-21 7:52 ` [gentoo-user] " Dirk Heinrichs
2009-01-21 8:31 ` Nickolas Fortino
2009-01-21 15:33 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2009-01-21 15:50 ` Nick Cunningham
2009-01-21 15:56 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-01-21 16:48 ` Grant Edwards
2009-01-21 17:38 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2009-01-21 18:31 ` Grant Edwards
2009-01-23 4:49 ` Grant Edwards
2009-01-23 4:55 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2009-01-23 5:17 ` Grant Edwards
2009-01-23 5:39 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2009-01-23 14:48 ` Grant Edwards
2009-01-25 7:12 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2009-01-24 23:29 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-01-25 1:29 ` Grant Edwards [this message]
2009-01-25 1:37 ` Grant Edwards
2009-01-25 6:19 ` Dale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='glgf8s$7s5$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=grante@visi.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox