From: Grant Edwards <grante@visi.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Tips/Tricks for Gentoo on low-spec computer?
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:18:00 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <gl60ko$c5q$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 49767252.1010908@gmail.com
On 2009-01-21, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's funny, I have read a lot of people complain that the binary is the
> same way but compiling from source works. Interesting. The reason I
> was told I should compile my own is because it was more stable than the
> binary.
The first time I tried installing OOo, I did the binary
install. It wouldn't run, so since then I've always built it.
> How do you figure that OOo from source is not supported?
I've been wondering that as well. I checked the package
database and the OOo ebuild is marked as stable for x86. In my
book, that's "supported". Of course that's not be the same
thing as "practical" for some machines (I believe my OOo emerge
just passed hour 31). It would be interesting to know how much
further it's go to go, but as long as it's done in a week or so
that'll be good enough. I remember building binutils, gcc,
X11, emacs, and so on from sources on a 25MHz 68000 with 4MB of
RAM -- that took some patience as well.
--
Grant
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-21 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-20 17:05 [gentoo-user] Tips/Tricks for Gentoo on low-spec computer? Volker Armin Hemmann
2009-01-20 17:14 ` Paul Hartman
2009-01-20 17:15 ` Alejandro
2009-01-20 17:22 ` Nick Cunningham
2009-01-20 17:32 ` Paul Hartman
2009-01-20 18:42 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-01-20 18:53 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2009-01-20 19:37 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2009-01-21 19:01 ` Daniel Troeder
2009-01-20 19:20 ` Grant Edwards
2009-01-21 15:57 ` Grant Edwards
2009-01-24 14:43 ` [gentoo-user] " Steven Lembark
2009-01-20 17:27 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2009-01-20 17:37 ` Paul Hartman
2009-01-20 17:56 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2009-01-20 18:00 ` s3b4sm4gr1
2009-01-20 19:23 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2009-01-21 1:00 ` [gentoo-user] " Dale
2009-01-24 14:53 ` Steven Lembark
2009-01-24 15:47 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2009-01-24 15:55 ` [gentoo-user] " Dale
2009-01-20 17:37 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2009-01-21 0:54 ` [gentoo-user] " Dale
2009-01-21 2:18 ` Grant Edwards [this message]
2009-01-21 3:28 ` [gentoo-user] " Paul Hartman
2009-01-21 3:49 ` Grant Edwards
2009-01-21 4:02 ` Paul Hartman
2009-01-21 3:39 ` Shawn Haggett
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-20 16:46 [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2009-01-20 17:05 ` Paul Hartman
2009-01-20 17:36 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2009-01-20 18:01 ` [gentoo-user] " Dirk Heinrichs
2009-01-20 19:30 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='gl60ko$c5q$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=grante@visi.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox