From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-89265-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1LOb41-0002wl-6h
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:04:01 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB68DE0330;
Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:03:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34BBE0330
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:03:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD2264696
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:03:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -3.375
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.375 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.224,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id VhdLxwP1NcLO for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:03:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A9064693
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:03:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1LOb3q-0003v8-MX
for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:03:46 +0000
Received: from 67-220-10-117.usiwireless.com ([67.220.10.117])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:03:46 +0000
Received: from grante by 67-220-10-117.usiwireless.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:03:46 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From: Grant Edwards <grante@visi.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Trouble decrypting message from firefox ebuild
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:03:36 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <gkvnd8$c82$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <gkvjq2$15r$1@ger.gmane.org> <200901181822.29981.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 67-220-10-117.usiwireless.com
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Linux)
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
X-Archives-Salt: 2959c9bc-ad26-4a32-b984-8a4fd86dfa0f
X-Archives-Hash: fee1bba959ced6337704e43ed4fb3a93
On 2009-01-18, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:
>> All the packages built against mozilla-firefox won't
>> compile, if after installing firefox 3.0 you get some
>> blockers, please add 'xulrunner' to your USE-flags.
>>
>> Does anybody have idea what the above sentence is trying to say?
>
> It's saying that if you use firefox -3*, then you should
> remove "firefox" from your USE and add "xulrunner" instead.
> This way, nothing in the tree will try to pull in firefox-2*
> (which obviously conflicts with firefox-3*).
>
> There have been 4 earlier threads on this very topic in the
> last fortnight. For more details, please check the recent
> archives (rehashing the same thing over and over is getting
> really tedious)
Do we get any clues as to what to search for? I searched back a
few weeks looking for subject lines containing "firefox" and
didn't find anything relevent.
--
Grant