From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L50Fz-0000g9-Of for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:55:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 49449E006C; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB50E006C for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBE66434D for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:55:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.526 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.526 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.073, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fKwOkgMTpgkM for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:55:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F15364330 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:55:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L50Fi-0004Wk-P3 for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:55:02 +0000 Received: from athedsl-24722.home.otenet.gr ([87.202.97.84]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:55:02 +0000 Received: from realnc by athedsl-24722.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:55:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage wants KDE4, I don't Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:50:52 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20081125133251.GC28346@croc.cantv.net> <200811250819.39737.dmitry@athabascau.ca> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-24722.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081121) In-Reply-To: <200811250819.39737.dmitry@athabascau.ca> Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 7c0941fb-831d-44b8-8a81-8c57cf750302 X-Archives-Hash: 3b79d463dd1c66acce92c6f555e0ae6a Dmitry S. Makovey wrote: > On November 25, 2008, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >> I didn't unmask nor keyword any *KDE4* stuff. Only KDE3. Previous >> portage was happy with that. The new portage is not. I have dozens of >> packages in package.keywords that look like this: >> >> kde-base/kdelibs > > in which case portage did exactly what you've asked it to. You should've > mentioned either which specific versions you're unmasking/keywording or > slots. Either way it's not a bug it's a true feature. I can see that now. I assumed it's not the right behavior because portage-2.1.4.5 did not pull KDE 4. Having: kde-base/kdelibs in keywords only keyworded the KDE 3 package. I'm not sure why. Maybe it was looking at what I have installed and used that slot only instead of every available slot. The new portage keywords all slots, installed or not.