From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KpOan-0003bE-6F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:40:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 34F3EE0228; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:40:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E422E0228 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:40:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B942164555 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:40:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.322 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.322 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.210, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FvtGGL-Z69GI for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5280F6464E for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KpOaG-00005B-0f for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:39:44 +0000 Received: from 64.251.14.41 ([64.251.14.41]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:39:44 +0000 Received: from grante by 64.251.14.41 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:39:44 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Grant Edwards Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Xinerama vs TwinView for dual monitor setup Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:39:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <200810112334.10957.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <48F2A477.5030600@netspace.net.au> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.251.14.41 User-Agent: slrn/pre0.9.9-102 (Linux) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 458a2add-4fde-4eae-9755-ba572c8c918d X-Archives-Hash: a784cb4ed1a1e38d3aa5bd28a5fc5497 On 2008-10-13, Iain Buchanan wrote: > Grant Edwards wrote: > [snip] >> >> There's a third option you haven't mentioned: two different >> displays rather than a large virtual display spread across two >> monitors. > > [snip] > >> Pros: >> >> * Mouse movement and focus still act like one large display. >> >> * Each display can have it's own set of virtual desktops and >> they can be switched indpendantly. > > Really? When I set up separate X screens, changing virtual desktops on > one display (eg from "VD1" to "VD2") also changed it on the other display. It probably depends on your window manager. I'm using XFCE, and switching "workspaces" as they're called in XFCE is independant for the two displays. >> * Things like window-manager panels/docs/taskbars are managed >> separately for the two displays. >> >> * Displays can have different resolutions, sizes, depths. > > So can xinerama / twinview :) I thought I had read somewhere that they had to have the same depth at least. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I'm having fun at HITCHHIKING to CINCINNATI visi.com or FAR ROCKAWAY!!