From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JGVi2-0002Ls-1W for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:39:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2673BE099A; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:38:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8BCE0999 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C65B650BA for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:38:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.372 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.372 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.840, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sc3Ta7uBGQDL for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8A364F25 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JGVh8-0005FU-O7 for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:38:22 +0000 Received: from 70.79.204.76 ([70.79.204.76]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:38:22 +0000 Received: from hawat.thufir by 70.79.204.76 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:38:22 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Thufir Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead? Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20080111082729.GA12107@localhost> <20080117100051.4777de2a@loonquawl.digimed.co.uk> <200801181604.46835.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <226E3168-8232-48C7-B77D-F7DFE2BFCF9E@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.79.204.76 User-Agent: Pan/0.131 (Ghosts: First Variation) Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: d17a902a-89ce-4394-8cc6-f4a4c2b1f2bc X-Archives-Hash: 952a6e7fbac6b846b4de79f392899935 On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:06:45 +0100, Lowe Schmidt wrote: > The scenario is a bit bizarre I'd say. It's hyperbole, definitely, but meant to illustrate that more users is=20 good. Oh well. > On Jan 18, 2008, at 7:46 PM, Thufir wrote: >=20 >> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:04:46 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> >> >>> Nope. The Ubuntu developers would probably just carry on doing what >>> they >>> doing now - developing on Ubuntu. What makes you think they'd change? >> >> They would continue to develop it even if *no-one*, outside of the >> developers, used it? We'll have to agree to disagree on that, even if >> it's a bit of hyperbole. -Thufir --=20 gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list