From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFwH9-0003fP-Cu for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:49:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29B2FE0BC0; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78784E0BA5 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D87657DC for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:47:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.397 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.397 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.202, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C7Fax8aKJMY7 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:47:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23765655F5 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:47:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JFwEw-0007tr-O9 for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:46:54 +0000 Received: from s01060016ec23af88.vc.shawcable.net ([70.79.204.76]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:46:54 +0000 Received: from hawat.thufir by s01060016ec23af88.vc.shawcable.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:46:54 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Thufir Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead? Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:46:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20080111082729.GA12107@localhost> <20080117100051.4777de2a@loonquawl.digimed.co.uk> <200801181604.46835.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s01060016ec23af88.vc.shawcable.net User-Agent: Pan/0.131 (Ghosts: First Variation) Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: f513440f-09f4-4f4c-b978-307a89bc4c73 X-Archives-Hash: 64b2f3f33c72cb701e2966c9e8c1fcf2 On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:04:46 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Nope. The Ubuntu developers would probably just carry on doing what the= y > doing now - developing on Ubuntu. What makes you think they'd change? They would continue to develop it even if *no-one*, outside of the=20 developers, used it? We'll have to agree to disagree on that, even if=20 it's a bit of hyperbole. -Thufir --=20 gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list