From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFOOD-0004ox-8B for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:38:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33F29E0957; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:37:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C45E0950 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:37:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A2565F5C for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:37:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.854 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.854 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.744, BAYES_05=-1.11] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QcqS326wyy4n for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC7766072 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JFONY-0007kE-8B for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:37:33 +0000 Received: from s01060016ec23af88.vc.shawcable.net ([70.79.204.76]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:37:32 +0000 Received: from hawat.thufir by s01060016ec23af88.vc.shawcable.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:37:32 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Thufir Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ? Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1200129071.4788842fc5816@imp.free.fr> <200801121231.42265.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s01060016ec23af88.vc.shawcable.net User-Agent: Pan/0.131 (Ghosts: First Variation) Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: afa73d1f-7857-4a3f-b348-0f7744c30915 X-Archives-Hash: 61bb1c0f30a63fc9649c4fd282228cd7 On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:51:33 +0000, James wrote: > You still believe gplv3 is a good thing? I think *GPLv3* is the spawn o= f > Satan, and that's the reason most of the kernel devs did not go for tha= t > *horse hockey*! I don't think that I was advocating gplv3, certainly that wasn't my=20 intent, just that (as a user) I wouldn't want Gentoo to use a BSD (or=20 Apache) license. I think I'll try to refrain from further participation in this thread. =20 Sometimes I like to stir things up, but this isn't one of them :( -Thufir --=20 gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list