From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-108930-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1NrCKt-0007XY-G6
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:36:07 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2482E089A;
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:35:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com (mail-bw0-f219.google.com [209.85.218.219])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7223DE0891
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:35:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so3429670bwz.26
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=iDtayiy5dbblkMAEmXgd/DmSKrraf2/9JpbxyQFTZhY=;
b=CAwd+YtJ0gURNKVHaxBuec26EUh6hM5a+7Ww2tOqJTSww/Hn9EkBr50LB3MoNZS0O3
5mCQnaO7pukJDsW6JVzkysHX57gp/DoDdvtrz2T+RMJwSWjmUvB6EIbK5FSB7UaIYoNK
YrBMWvo0qTginvHmtMGGSSXXBcrEOwVIkFhoo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
b=xSLjRqi9+i3r/5U4Y3LoRNUNx9BA8FD6nr0XjZGT2w5g6t0bNEksD1NEj3QmZ6r5ty
dEa0ZWNOhInnsmXsF08L6ChQc7wCNfmf5gLFLqKr7jc4HELFLmnn5A/r52v0xxZlz4As
EaBzCMPAGeidhmTq1RqZhkVVe87DmOfjg7aTk=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.134.6 with SMTP id h6mr6540620bkt.160.1268667355792; Mon,
15 Mar 2010 08:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53e35fd51003150806j192c2afer6ca71cb58d3db478@mail.gmail.com>
References: <53e35fd51003150806j192c2afer6ca71cb58d3db478@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:35:55 +0200
Message-ID: <fecdbac61003150835x1536f20ag9678b1088c25b0ab@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] wine cannot compile with jpeg flag
From: "Arttu V." <arttuv69@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: e3be8def-e92a-42a8-813a-f6702e76e016
X-Archives-Hash: 6c44c4e886857ee295a61aeb3b0fb618
On 3/15/10, Xi Shen <davidshen84@googlemail.com> wrote:
> i have enabled 'jpeg' flag in my /etc/make.conf, but i still cannot
> compile wine with jpeg support, and i really need this feature.
>
> the output of emerge -pv wine shows '(-jpeg)'. i think it is masked by
> profile. i then created '/etc/portage/profile/package.use.force', and
> putted 'app-emulation/wine jpeg' in it, but i still cannot compile
> wine with jpeg support.
Create /etc/portage/profile/package.use.mask and type in
'app-emulation/wine -jpeg' (note the minus) to locally unmask the jpeg
flag for wine.
I don't know how good idea that is, though, as
/usr/portage/profiles/arch/amd64/package.use.mask has the following
for wine (maybe you'd better check the relevant bugs noted for jpeg
first?):
# Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org> (02 Feb 2009)
# esd, bug 301824
# mp3, bug 283860, 299490
# jpeg, bug 283089, 303255, 299149
# capi, 292938
# ghoto2, 286563
# scanner, 299505
# hal, 299149
app-emulation/wine capi esd gphoto2 hal jpeg mp3 scanner
--
Arttu V.