From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-108829-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1Npq7O-0002aZ-Lx
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:40:34 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06A61E0C2D;
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:39:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com (mail-bw0-f219.google.com [209.85.218.219])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44BFE0C2D
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:39:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so515899bwz.26
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:39:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=JCnXat98JHbb2IfCMR7bD3v8bTSaCyCOHDA9lukQrA0=;
b=HGEKRIfns2A699JcFDsQifu+W9bya4D4jOcVfhouuuzlqr2zSTl59KUOjZ638luaA6
TgmAebPH2BKVrR7e0E0GU2DY0/s14wNrdNL3sfBnmETpV9cxT440T7t7KJ7kfq20RMNg
DbBUuBfEL9Kk0UfbATuvvQnRtNQKCe3McoGrE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
b=jJLV7yzT1LhxCfSJ44MvOLxSEfYInOZ1HaFLmKQXJWCyVaOffJvuv/d3e5qiXLClPe
lUV8ehGDfVKuJuJ37W/MR1uNVXaE2EdosL6EMKKlMaw97xbOn73AT51ZJMzIA+kROTNs
s2ZZ/qcntu48s+JvQglyQnZ+BtLLB6gKZzblk=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.6.203 with SMTP id a11mr149138bka.33.1268343550786; Thu,
11 Mar 2010 13:39:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b1003110751h28866137j3c20e69dceb99a61@mail.gmail.com>
References: <47a330c51003100028w11a44a61pdcba1e0b41c5cb5c@mail.gmail.com>
<fecdbac61003101258s4dd9e199w8210cb37a252baa4@mail.gmail.com>
<47a330c51003110703x4a891508ib2a38ed3afff9ac6@mail.gmail.com>
<5bdc1c8b1003110751h28866137j3c20e69dceb99a61@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:39:10 +0200
Message-ID: <fecdbac61003111339l3ccbadf0rd3de1ebd6db7fb3@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Only two people in the gentoo world is having this
problem?
From: "Arttu V." <arttuv69@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 0a7d5484-5df9-4d28-a147-4fc8c267502e
X-Archives-Hash: 7f676d3b4281ea520526855cc8b95f74
On 3/11/10, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote:
> to determine whether this package provides it. I cannot do that as I
> don't have lzma-utils on my systems anymore.
Well, that can be sort of done with, e.g.:
ebuild /usr/portage/app-arch/lzma-utils/lzma-utils-4.32.7.ebuild install
It will run emerge phases until the system creates the installation
image, but it won't merge the files into their proper locations in the
file system. Listing files in the image directory shows all the five
liblzmadec.* files (or symlinks) that would get installed.
> If you don't have lzma-utils on your system anymore then erase
> /usr/lib64/liblzmadec.la by hand and run revdep-rebuild -ip again and
> see if it's clean.
Yes, this whole issue smells like an overblown orphaned .la-file
issue. Package manager cannot help much with such, and IMHO it's not a
bug (well maybe in the package manager, but let's not start that
flamewar ;) ).
Anyway, if it were me I'd nuke the file in a heartbeat, but if OP is
too timid for that, he can also quarantine the file first, i.e., move
it to some other path where it won't cause trouble (and then delete
later). Also, (from the bug) his libarchive.la seems to still list the
.la, so he should re-emerge libarchive after moving away the orphaned
.la-file (or use lafilefixer?).
Still, there is something funny with paludis, as so many people using
it seem to have so many problems with orphaned libtool archive files.
Ahem, even the warning from exherbo front page is gone nowadays. Is it
production quality now? o.O
--
Arttu V.