From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-100476-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1MoaF7-00032t-MD
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:59:05 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0184E0752;
Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:59:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-fx0-f211.google.com (mail-fx0-f211.google.com [209.85.220.211])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A6BE0752
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:59:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so574222fxm.34
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=8cCRRyMSkcLmKeJN2hvPVdUtA8OhQKOMb2ERnasi5XA=;
b=P34E8QBSOwyhWzybCBGxZ6QBlnhjd+qaacPJGtcPRTtWQhnV4ZgKBBNfU2j37eZQYe
MiplTlxWOhdtXRJYPtEL/pHlFpYBFuLP0f5vpCrMOfuB4aO2kSuJRcT/xfrgWPYaLeD/
6P9uLOkXrE/G+RK3x+pLeKCE7AkOMblZQlrhE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
b=Q6/0B9MtF1GzndFzX5FXxm/5O72BRIyDpeGrxWc07KqWWSteV5j7iWAM0ZSKr8vFg7
mIka58GZM7wx30DBps4sxudHNwuNUmqkDRwaZa+DEDnu8emoylls0V808YQP/RwB4C0B
U+GiUik4SEMDRrrU4H18ft/MC3DS1ltZoFi4s=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.156.203 with SMTP id y11mr1295540bkw.200.1253267942819;
Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20090918104724.0fad6487@zaphod.digimed.co.uk>
References: <20090918101608.0fe2fba3@zaphod.digimed.co.uk>
<fecdbac60909180235o6997813gb870017a70294538@mail.gmail.com>
<20090918104724.0fad6487@zaphod.digimed.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:59:02 +0300
Message-ID: <fecdbac60909180259l336c54c2xfba0f89b355a5b73@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Skipping interactive emerges
From: "Arttu V." <arttuv69@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 7a3bdcda-e616-42fe-8304-4a0bcc07b219
X-Archives-Hash: 725780624c05886b5fff58ace0ef2a98
On 9/18/09, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:35:39 +0300, Arttu V. wrote:
>
>> eny interactivity (e.g., in make.conf):
>>
>> ACCEPT_PROPERTIES="-interactive"
>>
>> Then try to emerge something interactive:
>
> I just tried that, and instead of skipping the upgrades, it wanted to
> download several packages to a much older version :(
O.o
Care to share some of the packages causing this? Maybe some packages
have interactivity marked only in their later versions, and others
have it in their earlier ones?
As the feature is not advertised on the portage man-page it could also
be that it is still exceptionally buggy or non-functional somehow (but
the bug was closed ...) ... and also, maybe there is another way to do
this? This was the first one I found.
>> Naturally, I'm running 2.2rc-series portage, so 2.1 might not have it.
>
> I do, this is a ~amd64 system.
Ok, the box I tried that on was a mostly stable amd64, with only some
end-user programs and libs (like mozilla-firefox and xulrunner) on
testing. And naturally portage-2.2rc40, as you couldn't get kde4
without it the other year.
--
Arttu V.