* [gentoo-user] Possible bug with ~arch libgphoto2 and libexif?
@ 2009-09-01 15:21 Arttu V.
2009-09-01 15:28 ` Paul Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arttu V. @ 2009-09-01 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Hello,
Gentoo Humour Section strikes again, hitting me with a headshot, which
almost dropped me from my chair. This time it came with something
probably right out of Monty Python:
checking for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for libexif to use... yes
checking for libexif.la file in yes... wild guess that something is in yes
configure: WARNING:
* Warning:
* libtool file libexif.la could not be found.
* We may be linking against the WRONG library.
checking whether we use a version of libexif with ExifData.ifd[]... yes
checking libexif/exif-data.h usability... yes
checking libexif/exif-data.h presence... yes
checking for libexif/exif-data.h... yes
checking for function exif_data_new in libexif... yes
checking libexif library flags... "-Lyes/lib -lexif"
checking libexif cpp flags... "-Iyes/include"
Oh boy, I'm sure I'm running multilib, and using "yes" as my primary
path for my libraries. Anyone fought with the same thing and solved
it, or is this a new bug?
--
Arttu V.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Possible bug with ~arch libgphoto2 and libexif?
2009-09-01 15:21 [gentoo-user] Possible bug with ~arch libgphoto2 and libexif? Arttu V.
@ 2009-09-01 15:28 ` Paul Hartman
2009-09-01 15:39 ` Arttu V.
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Hartman @ 2009-09-01 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Arttu V.<arttuv69@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Gentoo Humour Section strikes again, hitting me with a headshot, which
> almost dropped me from my chair. This time it came with something
> probably right out of Monty Python:
>
> checking for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/pkg-config
> checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
> checking for libexif to use... yes
> checking for libexif.la file in yes... wild guess that something is in yes
> configure: WARNING:
> * Warning:
> * libtool file libexif.la could not be found.
> * We may be linking against the WRONG library.
>
> checking whether we use a version of libexif with ExifData.ifd[]... yes
> checking libexif/exif-data.h usability... yes
> checking libexif/exif-data.h presence... yes
> checking for libexif/exif-data.h... yes
> checking for function exif_data_new in libexif... yes
> checking libexif library flags... "-Lyes/lib -lexif"
> checking libexif cpp flags... "-Iyes/include"
>
> Oh boy, I'm sure I'm running multilib, and using "yes" as my primary
> path for my libraries. Anyone fought with the same thing and solved
> it, or is this a new bug?
Works for me using libgphoto2-2.4.7 and libexif-0.6.17 on ~amd64
checking for libexif to use... autodetect
checking for LIBEXIF... yes
checking whether we use a version of libexif with ExifData.ifd[]... yes
checking libexif/exif-data.h usability... yes
checking libexif/exif-data.h presence... yes
checking for libexif/exif-data.h... yes
checking for function exif_data_new in libexif... yes
checking libexif library flags... "-lexif -lm "
checking libexif cpp flags... "-I/usr/include/libexif "
checking for libusb-config... /usr/bin/libusb-config
configure: creating ./config.status
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Possible bug with ~arch libgphoto2 and libexif?
2009-09-01 15:28 ` Paul Hartman
@ 2009-09-01 15:39 ` Arttu V.
2009-09-01 15:48 ` Paul Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arttu V. @ 2009-09-01 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 9/1/09, Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Works for me using libgphoto2-2.4.7 and libexif-0.6.17 on ~amd64
>
> checking for libexif to use... autodetect
Wow, you get that autodetect thing, which I saw used within the
configure script or some of the autotools files. Now I gotta find out
why I get "yes" instead.
Care to share your USE flags concerning libgphoto2? I'm wondering if
there would be some difference, especially about USE="exif". On the
breaking system they are USE="bonjour exif hal nls -doc", with none of
the CAMERAS explicitly enabled.
--
Arttu V.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Possible bug with ~arch libgphoto2 and libexif?
2009-09-01 15:39 ` Arttu V.
@ 2009-09-01 15:48 ` Paul Hartman
2009-09-01 16:02 ` Arttu V.
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Hartman @ 2009-09-01 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Arttu V.<arttuv69@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/1/09, Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Works for me using libgphoto2-2.4.7 and libexif-0.6.17 on ~amd64
>>
>> checking for libexif to use... autodetect
>
> Wow, you get that autodetect thing, which I saw used within the
> configure script or some of the autotools files. Now I gotta find out
> why I get "yes" instead.
>
> Care to share your USE flags concerning libgphoto2? I'm wondering if
> there would be some difference, especially about USE="exif". On the
> breaking system they are USE="bonjour exif hal nls -doc", with none of
> the CAMERAS explicitly enabled.
in libgphoto2 I have "exif hal nls" and in CAMERAS I have "canon
ptp2". Everything else in USE and CAMERAS is disabled.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Possible bug with ~arch libgphoto2 and libexif?
2009-09-01 15:48 ` Paul Hartman
@ 2009-09-01 16:02 ` Arttu V.
2009-09-01 21:12 ` Alan McKinnon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arttu V. @ 2009-09-01 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 9/1/09, Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> wrote:
> in libgphoto2 I have "exif hal nls" and in CAMERAS I have "canon
> ptp2". Everything else in USE and CAMERAS is disabled.
Thanks for the comparison info. Meanwhile I tried to emerge libgphoto2
with USE="-exif", and that passed. I'll try it still with exif enabled
and without bonjour (the way you have it configured), and if I can
make any sense of the situation, I'll file a bug. Thanks!
--
Arttu V.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Possible bug with ~arch libgphoto2 and libexif?
2009-09-01 16:02 ` Arttu V.
@ 2009-09-01 21:12 ` Alan McKinnon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alan McKinnon @ 2009-09-01 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Tuesday 01 September 2009 18:02:02 Arttu V. wrote:
> On 9/1/09, Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > in libgphoto2 I have "exif hal nls" and in CAMERAS I have "canon
> > ptp2". Everything else in USE and CAMERAS is disabled.
>
> Thanks for the comparison info. Meanwhile I tried to emerge libgphoto2
> with USE="-exif", and that passed. I'll try it still with exif enabled
> and without bonjour (the way you have it configured), and if I can
> make any sense of the situation, I'll file a bug. Thanks!
I had the same issue as you.
USE="bonjour -exif hal" fixed it for me
--
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-01 16:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-09-01 15:21 [gentoo-user] Possible bug with ~arch libgphoto2 and libexif? Arttu V.
2009-09-01 15:28 ` Paul Hartman
2009-09-01 15:39 ` Arttu V.
2009-09-01 15:48 ` Paul Hartman
2009-09-01 16:02 ` Arttu V.
2009-09-01 21:12 ` Alan McKinnon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox