From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MiQzF-0001gC-6n for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:53:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF9EBE062D; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com (mail-bw0-f227.google.com [209.85.218.227]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E18FE0A98 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so91337bwz.34 for ; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:02:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=G02tRjMku5p9dZhjw+/OZ/Mv7+yvmW7RqDFelgPhLOw=; b=Bx+QUAuoWM8Q9EuzkkDLpt2uMwu/UBRMAIwhFSMbgjVGOE9yV1HFG1s2eNBJ0DVbL1 WCK1qTyffWlIiu7IpOK0L/ioW+Lq6dwCUKGwhAa+D0UPeqQ3LmHBKu6k1mmslN8Ybgmv 6aIFbRa9otGa2z2oTRX+bInQ9E/22VNFVy9SY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gCQ4cfcjlj4jmUB++WYsKpTmIBat7RFodYbmd1JeutL0wW0jNpcqYHjrb7zPA3rvcQ D0ZFF8repLoNa66C+KRq+OI16JHuyEmSylEwgUwc3G56KwqvZggZ3ycPDycHbvB/O50u QnoqcbgHRGDrSD/KEAGwbhYUpZRIF1xLp3RQQ= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.8.13 with SMTP id f13mr5587835bkf.150.1251820922880; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:02:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <58965d8a0909010848k402387f1ief32e7df542a4f91@mail.gmail.com> References: <58965d8a0909010828m478fa726u3992655a5b121553@mail.gmail.com> <58965d8a0909010848k402387f1ief32e7df542a4f91@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 19:02:02 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Possible bug with ~arch libgphoto2 and libexif? From: "Arttu V." To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: b9835f01-4c7c-42ce-8270-c1b3167f18e0 X-Archives-Hash: a9f17bb2a92ffdcfafbaee7cf0b35c20 On 9/1/09, Paul Hartman wrote: > in libgphoto2 I have "exif hal nls" and in CAMERAS I have "canon > ptp2". Everything else in USE and CAMERAS is disabled. Thanks for the comparison info. Meanwhile I tried to emerge libgphoto2 with USE="-exif", and that passed. I'll try it still with exif enabled and without bonjour (the way you have it configured), and if I can make any sense of the situation, I'll file a bug. Thanks! -- Arttu V.