From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MiQLw-0004KW-CY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:12:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 500E5E0827; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com (mail-bw0-f227.google.com [209.85.218.227]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D28E0827 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:21:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so49254bwz.34 for ; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 08:21:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=CYQrpaJlBwiFXvFLsMhC7qZOLevLKATpeNfNCG2PnLk=; b=u9rGCqY9Y2vFZUQBQ5J9vlq2/H3SQdeefbjfVeCr3d/oHOvRRkFN3Th2UWFipF23/K wROmMydmWZj3CRc89GLjqTW3z1q5qk3A5lBgLaGmrUfOipWxaI0TkBBLcYIE8s5iTNK9 V+TP4ZmCECSMo191WWDIBHQqvOfDTmtOMiE90= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=CtBfZDOorRAfMRoIqsymWobTPZyPMbWVTp+wiJmnTMJZ7+xRmsCDAknUTggDPCOkeD EIgZAjiJWPEFUcgAYOGF2TQBgFa38PPLXtvVxGHlW0E5+eqvGdQ5e0NsOKNr8CwiTXRM b+vUyZfJCcpmeIdVL7rfYMokCqTh5J0/i0Z3o= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.175.83 with SMTP id w19mr3240768bkz.24.1251818486175; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 08:21:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 18:21:26 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: [gentoo-user] Possible bug with ~arch libgphoto2 and libexif? From: "Arttu V." To: gentoo-user Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 8975a602-786f-42bc-ae4b-73dd6025dc61 X-Archives-Hash: 028a5033f9d415aa455ec03a3d06cb88 Hello, Gentoo Humour Section strikes again, hitting me with a headshot, which almost dropped me from my chair. This time it came with something probably right out of Monty Python: checking for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/pkg-config checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for libexif to use... yes checking for libexif.la file in yes... wild guess that something is in yes configure: WARNING: * Warning: * libtool file libexif.la could not be found. * We may be linking against the WRONG library. checking whether we use a version of libexif with ExifData.ifd[]... yes checking libexif/exif-data.h usability... yes checking libexif/exif-data.h presence... yes checking for libexif/exif-data.h... yes checking for function exif_data_new in libexif... yes checking libexif library flags... "-Lyes/lib -lexif" checking libexif cpp flags... "-Iyes/include" Oh boy, I'm sure I'm running multilib, and using "yes" as my primary path for my libraries. Anyone fought with the same thing and solved it, or is this a new bug? -- Arttu V.