From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-97046-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1MIlEX-0001R2-6g
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:14:57 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 632F2E055E;
	Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:14:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ew0-f211.google.com (mail-ew0-f211.google.com [209.85.219.211])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272C1E055E
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:14:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so63413ewy.34
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=PyiJAHYiBTpCNb0ajqH3jzKUVmtpDyWGuM6iS4QRzB8=;
        b=D+CqcHA4kFjKPS1K/mxcaGQ0XzZ9qT2Id6A6ajlP1yECxFxq20HksM/yGOwlKX0sBH
         CbEmvoWNef9HOS4vPTibs5uwCwEQWtg7C4JJqVTYH4L1qqVXgolhVsE1Al8dX8mVa18/
         Iqa49UhDR9lNGLmKlmM+YY5HpcJSAzyS2uN4A=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=wiOjqqphZWLTQriW2eCd4f+Hae55AUdATKwOWECmiNnB/ODmzdya/aTVXDJtrdFEL0
         S58G7WRoISEZSbxt5ayF/3VZvUbSgxnDnEyB14y0Itdop0BTyFhx7dsJIkWfHjb2aUpV
         8Rf8jEu1em4f2NGTvqEdmVqLj5UXUDU5idlLI=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.210.91.7 with SMTP id o7mr5021850ebb.32.1245683695602; Mon, 22 
	Jun 2009 08:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20090622T141046-284@post.gmane.org>
References: <loom.20090622T135257-441@post.gmane.org>
	 <loom.20090622T141046-284@post.gmane.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:14:55 +0300
Message-ID: <fecdbac60906220814i601f6dffk5f8e7e439926b595@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: package.keywords
From: "Arttu V." <arttuv69@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: d7796c32-e866-4360-b71b-33c230e48e6a
X-Archives-Hash: 43cd85588f3d540b4f033fbe9893b823

On 6/22/09, James <wireless@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> Where do I read more and find more of the latest example for
> syntax with portage and the different files therein?
<snip />
> It should have read:
>
> 'man portage' does not show the use of the (><=) syntax
> within the package.keywords file ?

No, but it instructs one to peek into man 5 ebuild for the info. If
you look again at the portage manpage, the section on package.keywords
states of the file format:

"one DEPEND atom per line followed by additional KEYWORDS"

And at the top (Glossary) it says about these atoms:

"DEPEND atom
                     A string which matches a package.  It is of the
form category/package.  It may also contain optional logical operators
and versions.
                     More reading: ebuild(5)"

Follow this "more reading"-hint by entering "man 5 ebuild". The
resulting manpage tells you quite extensively (even everything?) about
the atoms, with many examples, and more.

It takes a meticulous, technically inclined (or otherwise
anal-retentive? :) ) mind to read these manpage-thingies which were
structured and invented before the modern hypertext-intarweb hit the
streets two decades ago. And sure, some of them are written badly, but
IMHO the gentoo ones are pretty ok from a user's POV.

So, as a conclusion, you probably want to use ~ instead of >= in there
as you apparently are running a mostly stable box (arch) instead of
testing (~arch)?

-- 
Arttu V.