public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Arttu V." <arttuv69@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ARGH I uninstalled python
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 01:56:49 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fecdbac60905241556l7cef1988xa85de7d155ab7819@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200905242054.14443.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>

On 5/24/09, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dale asked *where* system is defined, not what it consists of.

Well, he was asking many things. One can run into several directions
with all the questions he asked, depending on the assumptions one
makes. ;)

> It appears you are completely missing the point. It is indeed very easy to
> add things to the @system set, but we are talking about the system set,
> and it is broken out of the box as shipped.

I'm just focusing on it on a level where we (the users, me, you, Mr.
Dalek, or the OP) can do things about it, where we have immediate
write access. That rules out the Gentoo repos and leaves the local
boxes.

We also can and should escalate it to those who can do more, and IIRC
some kind person (you? missed it and forgot who it was) already
offered to file the bug. Short of becoming a dev, what more can be
done in a volunteer-based distro?

> Portage will not let you unmerge portage or gcc without a fight.

Been there, done exactly that (with gcc), though no t-shirts were
awarded. A 10-second countdown (IIRC) is hardly a "fight". (But the
reinstall sure was, won't do it ever again if I simply can avoid it!)
:)

> But it's not working that way today. Ergo, it is broken.

I think that is what we agree on, it warrants an escalation (a bug or
a feature request). It is the immediate things vs. higher level
reporting that we seem to be slightly mixed up about.

I already asked quickly about this on #gentoo on Saturday and the
resident devs there hadn't heard about this, but didn't really appear
that worried either. I won't blame them. This won't destroy your data,
this will only make certain breakage cases a bit more complicated, and
if you really need the four or five nines uptimes, you can try
mitigating the problem by, e.g., going full scale buildpkg for
everything.

Furthermore, the glep-55 discussion seems to be heating up again on
the -dev-list, so I wouldn't expect the devs to be quick to fix
anything related to the PMS/multiple package manager issues right now.
They're too busy flinging all shades of poo. Summer, they should have
lectures and exams during summer at Universities, too. :/

-- 
Arttu V.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-24 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-22 23:36 [gentoo-user] ARGH I uninstalled python Jon Hardcastle
2009-05-23  0:03 ` Dale
2009-05-23  1:33   ` Arttu V.
2009-05-23 11:11     ` Dale
2009-05-23 11:52       ` Arttu V.
2009-05-23 11:59         ` Dale
2009-05-23 20:02           ` Neil Bothwick
2009-05-23 21:08             ` Dale
2009-05-24  9:07             ` Alan McKinnon
2009-05-24  9:28               ` Neil Bothwick
2009-05-24 10:06                 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-05-24 12:17                   ` Dale
2009-05-24 14:26                     ` Neil Bothwick
2009-05-24 15:33                       ` Dale
2009-05-24 16:22                       ` Alan McKinnon
2009-05-24 17:26                         ` Dale
2009-05-24 17:54                           ` Alan McKinnon
2009-05-24 18:06                             ` Arttu V.
2009-05-24 18:54                               ` Alan McKinnon
2009-05-24 19:32                                 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2009-05-24 20:51                                 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-05-24 22:56                                 ` Arttu V. [this message]
2009-05-24 18:11                             ` Dale
2009-05-24 18:56                               ` Alan McKinnon
2009-05-24 19:15                                 ` Dale
2009-05-24 20:41                         ` Neil Bothwick
2009-05-24 21:09                           ` Dale
2009-05-24 23:34                           ` Stroller
2009-05-23 12:33         ` Alan McKinnon
2009-05-23 13:16           ` Dale
2009-05-23  7:55 ` Jorge Morais
2009-05-23 10:34   ` Jorge Morais
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-27  8:32 Jon Hardcastle
2009-05-27  9:47 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-05-27 12:29 ` Jorge Morais
2009-05-27 12:55 ` Stroller
2009-05-23 10:51 Jon Hardcastle
2009-05-23 22:08 ` Jorge Morais
2009-05-24  8:52   ` Keith Dart
2009-05-24 10:09     ` Jorge Morais
2009-05-24 12:31       ` Keith Dart
2009-05-24  9:08   ` Alan McKinnon
2009-05-24 13:07     ` Jorge Morais
2009-05-27 12:49   ` Jorge Morais
2009-05-27 20:28     ` Wyatt Epp
2009-05-27 21:06       ` Jorge Morais
2009-05-27 21:55       ` Neil Bothwick
2009-05-28  9:37         ` Wyatt Epp
2009-05-23 10:50 Jon Hardcastle
2009-05-22 23:05 Jon Hardcastle
2009-05-22 23:13 ` Michal Sroka
2009-05-22 23:19 ` Dale

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fecdbac60905241556l7cef1988xa85de7d155ab7819@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=arttuv69@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox