From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-88935-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1LM18P-0006hS-3G
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:17:49 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B3D9E03F2;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:13:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.159])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D98DE03F2
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:13:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so2163180fga.14
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 06:13:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
         :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=km0zcwRD7eguo/txho31VToLRVMJGs82IPqyp3Z6QcM=;
        b=Kc6My4gQubZG4fhXJWKJ5GwGQLRoy+ElhoKWZ/8wFSIRWYT98mmMzfKvVX4LJ1crvB
         1izPaZsf4wb6ZfudL8op1L2mjAUen11qhecZbxWadlW/LPpHCMKt1jyl11wcTsWqAMoT
         /j+IvyNb3o4bupvwz5OvU8yGYbQ2wX5zqohH8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=DxQn2fc3zb/LD+s2hlPsZ3SYaOjr68h7NURo3XIN7Ab/TCvB4yWssxLWg2LWVHnSWm
         09+bZRGzz7JYkL9b7reSmFM/m8kfsNr0wrFZ5q9XHxW3k3ztx+k6RJH8mRFPyHc0Nb0a
         7lywPgumoD50JzpG+cXbM90yRckm3IwuaAaPU=
Received: by 10.86.95.8 with SMTP id s8mr16124973fgb.28.1231683224399;
        Sun, 11 Jan 2009 06:13:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.86.28.6 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 06:13:44 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <fecdbac60901110613v13ff7f0fledcbc44abffdda8b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:13:44 +0200
From: "Arttu V." <arttuv69@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [cifs] permissions of mounted share
In-Reply-To: <8763kmgw2t.fsf@newsguy.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <8763kmgw2t.fsf@newsguy.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 88421ba7-b826-4ef8-b9e2-75520423b5ba
X-Archives-Hash: fc4e352a9be466feb97571e346df139c

On 1/11/09, Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com> wrote:
> Any regular files I create on the mounted share end up 744.
>
> Can I set a umask in the mount syntax or what do I need to do here to
> have the files keep the standard permissions?

force create mode = 644
force directory mode = 755

Wouldn't that do it on the server so you wouldn't have to worry about
the clients? Or have you already tried and it still fudges the access
permissions?

-- 
Arttu V.