From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-87562-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1L9z9n-0007NV-Ec
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 09:45:31 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60185E06CE;
	Tue,  9 Dec 2008 09:45:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com (gv-out-0910.google.com [216.239.58.187])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE75E06CE
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue,  9 Dec 2008 09:45:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n8so282552gve.39
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:45:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
         :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=AlLZ66gqeH+PHJ9hgq/HV+G87b+1W9ZQeV97uiW98MI=;
        b=WyFBrF/90lxadRBIE0vUXiqUbI1eojhvHvFseRusQRzaMYM7h4xcoeN4Wi+LO/DdGD
         +ua0gqBXhhQeiTgQL7QfH8IUkF6NNvwURNmO5gwrX/CFLdLxxeo5YQgp5oihKq+A/pLF
         l3Hqq3Ju5u/o+og2ENLCY8RDM5ba/weu8nR8w=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=Z4BsLCx9mv/oEqMHvtu/VoE5T6YQEsYyCOIJAHPWfApAfSBGDBdhuNq4lfDcQbt9Ga
         D0gN2WgT3NcXsWUMO/ph08f+QLASh7gBhPiE4pIRUAQmmCWWYzSSZBgUSSapUVVA+yd4
         tiPIFZlcQLl9zCDeXPEQw509v+BqF9TpJbKM4=
Received: by 10.103.192.10 with SMTP id u10mr1611104mup.101.1228815927241;
        Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:45:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.103.90.19 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 01:45:26 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <fecdbac60812090145v5ec54267s3a411cd8e2c18b86@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:45:26 +0200
From: "Arttu V." <arttuv69@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] if I unmerge XYZ...
In-Reply-To: <200812091221.44705.a@gaydenko.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200812091221.44705.a@gaydenko.com>
X-Archives-Salt: eee3f0ef-e61e-4fe9-ba03-085fc446e876
X-Archives-Hash: e42c3a9548f549eebe10d2966b5ba51b

On 12/9/08, Andrew Gaydenko <a@gaydenko.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there a way to predict which dependecies will be unsatisfied at case of
> unmerging some package without real unmerging?

Not being quite sure what "without real unmerging" here means, I'd
recommend checking out the man page of equery, especially the
"depends" option.

Maybe "equery --indirect depends foo" is what you're looking for?

-- 
Arttu V.