From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B751F139083 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 03:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C897CE0F59; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 03:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ot0-x22e.google.com (mail-ot0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66A83E0F1F for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 03:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id h9so8245294oti.0 for ; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 19:53:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xJ0RSfyaVznhjTdl7ixlNahULKrdpiZZdcNhDPlgkvo=; b=E2dIbzzE3ljnurqGDEo+3cMqKZhvMZ1VAxV+wJFus9TmIzgyg4bN6RcXf4cwywVWj9 i1fiYF+mNa79SmJYCUnP9jOCIMduyk3UVA2f7oi/gYn8Jy2BJqupbEMsegNTkiKdkJs8 eS9xftJsAGv/eCdnyFsWLPF+QFt/q39Fe1unD5BtLmC/jbHS97A38ZkKI7FaieBVpMJJ K466jAz2TW/uxg4HrSm0fOP8V+Go9PCm5jRTSv6cdKBwg2JlilV7JGzV1Mx2ZtkYy+yn LVu2IgFJUKiSpq5geneLFbIYDm1SHcEnwrwRDF3EP0F6elKaxq7uU/ysWwsn5NLAI9zl Mdcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xJ0RSfyaVznhjTdl7ixlNahULKrdpiZZdcNhDPlgkvo=; b=EL0rbqnV8RgtxDtgPeLyXC+XbdIHLDM9E8NbhH8ornVmHaNnNmeP3gikosU7UMpvVe tvn3cv/EPtRH8HSgq2e/5leEaGXSJk1GVfw8m+2j04iGipb4tUv1bha3QIvG0V5PIS8h gGozLLy5jkWVygG79WpKGA7CyHGdXJBUvbIfhwQK1X4IwfYib3yDnILTFpnv+Yxi4jyh jCtujl2ERGN1E2IyGdKWhpWMVBfZqBDrUMpAAH0i/z7YeoF1BEdz4V9CCrLb2ya7Mspb pDpssuBIl3xZUYaqwxslp8e4ad2L+GP+quo8O6sCP8uhtpgb2k+b7JxfMMY1s5zGlIl6 OH+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7mnEi6dcFJEBZW811c2amcSaSuArV/aoymJHIobZbNK29jMzhf N1AukyFj41hlWE7pOC/O8erF8Uag X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZnrFt4KXGt4sBKOD/KmpM5wHdelRqh7oZl3m2K23mju5qK1PJ3j1KjMMgf8+a3ilRFkMzGLw== X-Received: by 10.157.94.14 with SMTP id d14mr25644511oti.47.1512705237299; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 19:53:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.14] (cpe-70-114-132-54.austin.res.rr.com. [70.114.132.54]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d50sm3099488otf.8.2017.12.07.19.53.56 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Dec 2017 19:53:57 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Update is blocked by ots previous version...? To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <20171208023611.zdkmtwejqupsqorx@solfire> From: Jalus Bilieyich Message-ID: Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 21:53:56 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171208023611.zdkmtwejqupsqorx@solfire> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 171450fb-faef-4773-8c56-e3b91718a71e X-Archives-Hash: bd21e8ae2231cd10fd2c72cc64c4adcb Put in package.mask: >=app-emulation/containerd-1.0.0:0/0 On 12/07/2017 08:36 PM, tuxic@posteo.de wrote: > Hi, > > this morning in its endless wisdom emerge spake to me today: > > | WARNING: One or more updates/rebuilds have been skipped due to a dependency conflict: > | > | app-emulation/containerd:0 > | > | (app-emulation/containerd-1.0.0:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) conflicts with > | ~app-emulation/containerd-1.0.0_beta2_p20171019 required by (app-emulation/docker-17.11.0:0/0::gentoo, installed) > | ^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > I removed containerd yesterday and installed it again only to get the same > error this morning again. > > Any away around this? > > Cheers > Meino > > > >