On 12/15/05, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:29:55 +0100, Harald Arnesen wrote:
> > I don't use it any more because it is slow, cp and cat give the same
> > result and are faster.
>
> dd is not slower than cp/cat if you increase the block size from the
> default 512 bytes.