From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8B961396D9 for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 14:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C9712BC03B; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 14:31:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBB942BC017 for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 14:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-98-218-46-55.hsd1.md.comcast.net [98.218.46.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mjo) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7652933BE2E for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 14:31:35 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] emerge default opts To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <7b5a9f$98b69k@relay.skynet.be> <94e84688-54b9-8b94-300d-f70b71104332@gmail.com> <53791738-ff06-fcfb-9753-52fc62f469bb@gentoo.org> <4c7096eb-c0f7-bb08-870f-ff5489958534@gmail.com> From: Michael Orlitzky Message-ID: Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 10:31:29 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4c7096eb-c0f7-bb08-870f-ff5489958534@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 35e906dd-c978-4559-91ae-da0248924826 X-Archives-Hash: eb1bb055fe5d6dcf5671fbc7b94c124b On 10/14/2017 09:30 PM, Dale wrote: > > While at it.  Is there a tool that tells when USE flags in make.conf is > either no longer used or doesn't even exist anymore? I don't know of one. It doesn't *sound* hard, but you would have to consider local use flags, flags from overlays, USE_EXPAND flags, wildcards, USE_ORDER, etc. -- so maybe it's actually hard/slow to do it. I found this feature request, https://github.com/vaeth/eix/issues/38 and I guess that confirms that it's harder than it looks. Checking for nonexistent flags would be easier than checking for redundant flags because the latter depends on your package manager configuration.