From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I5qXQ-0006Z2-Ez for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 22:08:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l63M6hdp017645; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:06:43 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l63M0Z7a010951 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:00:35 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7709656EF for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:00:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 required=5.5 tests=[none] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oheSJ+MHn8ec for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD8A065745 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I5qQ4-0002vX-As for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:00:24 +0200 Received: from s0106000b6abea981.vs.shawcable.net ([24.86.149.50]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:00:24 +0200 Received: from hawat.thufir by s0106000b6abea981.vs.shawcable.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:00:24 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Thufir Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Is Gentoo Healthy? (The Return) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <49bf44f10707030907jaa9f524maef27beb2a7c9df@mail.gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b0707030946x5e951d3dg1c7dd261ee89f1d0@mail.gmail.com> <49bf44f10707031014l5c52585fo6087c9e4502bf401@mail.gmail.com> <200707031941.34493.tcoulon@decoulon.ch> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s0106000b6abea981.vs.shawcable.net User-Agent: Pan/0.131 (Ghosts: First Variation) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 9811d444-1212-425c-bc7c-212eae0320e7 X-Archives-Hash: 4f5f9e9a2d50b79b799eeec903963970 On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 19:41:34 +0200, Thierry de Coulon wrote: > I think the future of Gentoo could be that: an "easy install" for the > mass, and he opportunity for the geeks to tweak that install or directly > go for the total customisation. Then the install process wouldn't screen out users. -Thufir -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list