From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-194697-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57BBE1382C5
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 18:01:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7141E0B72;
	Wed, 30 Dec 2020 18:01:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.hosts.co.uk (smtp.hosts.co.uk [85.233.160.19])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90238E0B1E
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 18:01:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from host86-158-105-41.range86-158.btcentralplus.com ([86.158.105.41] helo=[192.168.1.65])
	by smtp.hosts.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim)
	(envelope-from <antlists@youngman.org.uk>)
	id 1kufmu-0001my-Db
	for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 18:01:32 +0000
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ncurses; I think I wrecked my fresh install
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
References: <X+pP87ML1gEdhUnB@waltdnes.org> <9095281.eNJFYEL58v@noumea>
 <X+u1PqhZNCPiT7hB@waltdnes.org> <3360034.dWV9SEqChM@noumea>
From: antlists <antlists@youngman.org.uk>
Message-ID: <f5491ea2-ee3a-ebd2-f26a-cd39d216e450@youngman.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 18:01:32 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.6.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3360034.dWV9SEqChM@noumea>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archives-Salt: 970123d7-d90c-4acb-901a-08bc61f8200c
X-Archives-Hash: 6218a4eede7dd76a62e84dc1a164b477

On 30/12/2020 17:30, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> That's true, though registrars are filtering for it now. Also, I just checked,
> e.g. firefox always builds with unicode support (it would have trouble with a
> lot of websites otherwise).
> 
> (: ˙˙˙ǝpoɔᴉun sǝop oslɐ ʇuǝᴉlɔ lᴉɐɯ ɹnoʎ uǝɥʇ ¿sᴉɥʇ pɐǝɹ noʎ uɐɔ 'ʍʇq

Except something's wrong because eg "d" renders correctly upside down, 
but "t" clearly has the wrong baseline, and looking at the serifs "l" 
isn't upside down at all.

Cheers,
Wol