From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E04E139335 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 15:44:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6ED0AE08C3; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 15:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hosts.co.uk (smtp.hosts.co.uk [85.233.160.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13E1BE0825 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 15:44:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host86-157-72-169.range86-157.btcentralplus.com ([86.157.72.169] helo=[192.168.1.65]) by smtp.hosts.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim) (envelope-from ) id 1lxWxh-0003lF-9s for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 16:44:45 +0100 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] New install - Wayland and graphical login To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <60D0BDF3.9000302@youngman.org.uk> <2781279.e9J7NaK4W3@lenovo.localdomain> <60D83F77.2010607@youngman.org.uk> <2782119.e9J7NaK4W3@lenovo.localdomain> <10085e1b-c8fc-22ab-a6a1-3c9b6b2bf352@users.sourceforge.net> From: antlists Message-ID: Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 16:44:46 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <10085e1b-c8fc-22ab-a6a1-3c9b6b2bf352@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: d8f5fbc9-6251-40de-943b-75688477ae40 X-Archives-Hash: 6716d46862823e132fbfbe86f80ab8b0 On 27/06/2021 16:14, Jack wrote: > I noticed that one post mentioned /dev/card1 and the other talked about > /dev/dri/card0.  If the former was not a typo omitting /dri/ then that > might be something to check out. > > The former was a what I remembered ... quite possibly wrong ... :-) Cheers, Wol