From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HL39E-0001ia-GI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:05:36 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l1OK4KAT007421; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:04:20 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l1OJx8ti032729 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:59:08 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06331646FA for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:59:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.55 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.049, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 626WJnGQt+rd for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:59:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEFD364B64 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:58:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HL32Y-0006Zp-9J for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:58:42 +0100 Received: from grante.dsl.visi.com ([208.42.141.248]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:58:42 +0100 Received: from grante by grante.dsl.visi.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:58:42 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Grant Edwards Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Bon Echo (why?) Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:58:23 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <45E0970D.7010000@gmail.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: grante.dsl.visi.com User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (Linux) Sender: news Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: bea40d0c-1532-4df5-bf80-fbb2716b6b6c X-Archives-Hash: de332edda735e6d61471083212d733cc On 2007-02-24, Gyuszk wrote: > Dear gentoo users, > > As you all know, Firefox 2.0.0.2 is stable on x86 in Portage. When one > emerges it, Gnome menu call, and the software calls itself (in about > box) Bon Echo (the codename of Firefox 2 development tree). Why? Some licensing BS or other. > Is really development version of Firefox in Portage, or what? If you want it to call itself "Firefox" add mozbranding to your USE flags. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! A can of ASPARAGUS, at 73 pigeons, some LIVE ammo, visi.com and a FROZEN DAQUIRI!! -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list