From: Grant Edwards <grante@visi.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: X-Forwarding over wireless
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:26:52 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <erkcns$gnl$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 49bf44f10702220705qc4e4be2u7cbe798fd1ffa896@mail.gmail.com
On 2007-02-22, Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I wonder if I need more power on the machine running the apps instead
>> >> of more bandwidth. It has 512MB and I do need to upgrade that, but it
>> >> feels like a bandwidth problem when I'm running vmware via
>> >> X-Forwarding.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Could be bandwidth.
>>
>> More likely it's latency. Most "modern" X apps seem to require
>> a lot of round-trips between client and server. The latency of
>> a Wifi link is probably 10-100X that of a wired Ethernet link,
>> even if the bandwidth is the same: A 54M Wifi link may
>> actually have more bandwidth than a 10M wired Ethernet link,
>> but the lower latancy of the wired link will result in
>> better performance for some classes of applications.
>
> Do you think vnc or nx would be a significant improvement over
> x-forwarding?
I've never directly compared the them, but I've seen posts by
others saying they've have had better luck with vnc or nx on
high latency links.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! I am having FUN... I
at wonder if it's NET FUN or
visi.com GROSS FUN?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-22 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-21 14:45 [gentoo-user] X-Forwarding over wireless Grant
2007-02-22 8:09 ` Jakob
[not found] ` <1172080487.31460.4.camel@blackwidow.nbk>
2007-02-22 13:06 ` Grant
2007-02-22 13:44 ` Albert Hopkins
2007-02-22 14:55 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2007-02-22 15:05 ` Grant
2007-02-22 15:26 ` Uwe Thiem
2007-02-22 15:26 ` Grant Edwards [this message]
2007-02-22 15:24 ` Uwe Thiem
2007-02-22 15:49 ` Grant Edwards
2007-02-22 17:59 ` Hans-Werner Hilse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='erkcns$gnl$1@sea.gmane.org' \
--to=grante@visi.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox