public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Edwards <grante@visi.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user]  Re: gcc 3.4.6 vs. 4.1.1
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:25:13 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <er0999$jkn$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 45D3A71E.70105@exceedtech.net

On 2007-02-15, Dale <dalek@exceedtech.net> wrote:

>> I know -- that's what I do now (except the other way around)
>> for packages that require gcc 4.  I just figured I wait to do
>> the big switch/recompile until I can get rid of 3.4 completely.
>>
>> I'll probably just do a clean reinstall at that point.  When I
>> switched gcc from 3.2 to 3.3, it would have been a lot less
>> work to just re-install from scratch.
>
> When I switched a while back, I found a script to do the recompile on
> the forums that worked very well.  It is better than doing a system
> twice then a world on top of that.  I have a copy of the script if you
> would like to use it but it is on the forums somewhere.  I may can find
> it.  I think it is in the documentation tips and tricks section, I think.

I think I've seen it.  The last time I around I followed a
script in a HOWTO using revdep-rebuild, and I ran into a lot of
problems during the re-compile: there were about a half dozen
packages that wouldn't rebuild.  Getting things going again
required about two days of masking different versions of
different packages (each of which required masking a bunch of
dependencies to get compatible versions of everything).

-- 
Grant Edwards                   grante             Yow!  Not SENSUOUS... only
                                  at               "FROLICSOME"... and in
                               visi.com            need of DENTAL WORK... in
                                                   PAIN!!!

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-15  0:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-14 19:47 [gentoo-user] gcc 3.4.6 vs. 4.1.1 Grant Edwards
2007-02-14 20:12 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-02-14 20:58   ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2007-02-14 21:36     ` Jerry McBride
2007-02-14 21:53     ` Willie Wong
2007-02-14 23:30     ` Norberto Bensa
2007-02-14 23:35       ` Grant Edwards
2007-02-15  0:19         ` Dale
2007-02-15  0:25           ` Grant Edwards [this message]
2007-02-15  0:50             ` Dale
2007-02-15 22:09         ` b.n.
2007-02-14 20:13 ` [gentoo-user] " Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2007-02-14 20:26   ` Willie Wong
2007-02-14 20:17 ` Ric de France
2007-02-15  6:42 ` Andrey Gerasimenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='er0999$jkn$1@sea.gmane.org' \
    --to=grante@visi.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox