From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HoWlp-0002xA-3j for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 May 2007 03:35:17 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4H3Y7OE023113; Thu, 17 May 2007 03:34:07 GMT Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.237]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4H3R3AP013952 for ; Thu, 17 May 2007 03:27:04 GMT Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 60so433748wri for ; Wed, 16 May 2007 20:27:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=euEqR3ITIMW/RFhDsgdu+QQYYUIumgks8dmSva65UzX4lc4c2klQkQg3+s9IBxumAjxEdMc6535nJEVUhr02OY8SebK9iM43oJj6T79ykTtKnZmS1db2teDVg5I9uYxPbN9ezYp7kgkKPZQVrR6S53k4U36hVQomSq3lN9i+MKA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=l5tqJ/KYLLCerxrXe1ZsaukPnXRn/04ldwXsz/855UTpJDrMY6tq2y2AkfuCWZxt2prLIOMtB/9hkLyZ3XVY/HKYtx1Ixa9cJlbgBAaEl2+Xi9zbjQDcyXSUsiQ/Xx/5oVItnbZ5VhHIE+K8w4RrLcmOn1YEI/Il90HDr+tR+Vc= Received: by 10.78.195.9 with SMTP id s9mr3055728huf.1179372422990; Wed, 16 May 2007 20:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.140.11 with HTTP; Wed, 16 May 2007 20:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 23:27:02 -0400 From: "Rob Rutherford" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OPenOffice broken In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_19776_23598079.1179372422928" References: X-Archives-Salt: b38058a5-91ba-47fa-bf54-f6de5915c549 X-Archives-Hash: 4cf89dd5f094837df125f5155c1b8e1f ------=_Part_19776_23598079.1179372422928 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 5/16/07, Rob Rutherford wrote: > > > > On 5/16/07, James wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I've tried OO-bin and now I compiles OO on an amd64. > > both do not have spell check working. Now on the compiled > > version, I get this message when it fires up, repeated about > > 14 times to the console: > > > > (process:7216): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_screen_get_font_options: assertion > > `GDK_IS_SCREEN (screen)' failed > > > > > > It seems to work, but no spell checking? > > > > > > The flags are similar to as what I use elsewhere on x\86. > > > > any ideas? > > > > > > James > > The spell check is based on the language setting for the text in the document. Format->Character->Font Make sure the language is set correctly you probably want English (USA) . ------=_Part_19776_23598079.1179372422928 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

On 5/16/07, Rob Rutherford <rlrutherford@gmail.com> wrote:


On 5/16/07, James <wireless@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
Hello,

I've tried OO-bin and now I compiles OO on an amd64.
both do not have spell check working. Now on the compiled
version, I get this message when it fires up, repeated about
14 times to the console:

(process:7216): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_screen_get_font_options: assertion
`GDK_IS_SCREEN (screen)' failed


It seems to work, but no spell checking?


The flags are similar to as what I use elsewhere on x\86.

any ideas?


James

The spell check is based on the language setting for the text in the document. Format->Character->Font Make sure the language is set correctly you probably want English (USA) .
------=_Part_19776_23598079.1179372422928-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list