From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HoWkd-0001Uv-Nw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 May 2007 03:34:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4H3W0Aw020301; Thu, 17 May 2007 03:32:00 GMT Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4H3Q4qG012958 for ; Thu, 17 May 2007 03:26:04 GMT Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so220230ugc for ; Wed, 16 May 2007 20:26:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=S2duR10iFd5Z7TpaAxF5tZYNxsU7Enld6WI34BnHavuAb5qdBT8k41X2DX+PUKuUAVFDS/ebzWYl0R8IxQimM2fEx4K6q+sZhHgg+QTTgzl7L5sEeD5fMB+EXV0dcdD8VCiC2dGeGQ7K94uyU2K+wutQfxfR07d7FlacQPgT49s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Jnpxn3QKbII6H/65EYXXr6sIflr3OPb12cSdv8CepcGn90VnMW/bXA5wRDlRQg61CxZSdcxNHty5LgfYCBx1r3oto/wlXNFT4Sto0er/ynpUna1kngtKy4QwAOzXeDCbC18O0upIfc1br7nb2F3FdZ+J5VztzfTPkyABL5cmETg= Received: by 10.78.122.16 with SMTP id u16mr3054059huc.1179372363980; Wed, 16 May 2007 20:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.140.11 with HTTP; Wed, 16 May 2007 20:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 23:26:03 -0400 From: "Rob Rutherford" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OPenOffice broken In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_19752_14205637.1179372363916" References: X-Archives-Salt: 62bc918e-eef8-4ed1-b4cf-20a10123dc73 X-Archives-Hash: 475e6f77813524ba1acc27b342017385 ------=_Part_19752_14205637.1179372363916 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline The spell check is based on the language setting for the text in the document. Format->Character->Font Make sure the language is set correctly you probably want English (USA) . On 5/16/07, James wrote: > > Hello, > > I've tried OO-bin and now I compiles OO on an amd64. > both do not have spell check working. Now on the compiled > version, I get this message when it fires up, repeated about > 14 times to the console: > > (process:7216): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_screen_get_font_options: assertion > `GDK_IS_SCREEN (screen)' failed > > > It seems to work, but no spell checking? > > > The flags are similar to as what I use elsewhere on x\86. > > any ideas? > > > James > > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > ------=_Part_19752_14205637.1179372363916 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline The spell check is based on the language setting for the text in the document. Format->Character->Font Make sure the language is set correctly you probably want English (USA) .

On 5/16/07, James <wireless@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
Hello,

I've tried OO-bin and now I compiles OO on an amd64.
both do not have spell check working. Now on the compiled
version, I get this message when it fires up, repeated about
14 times to the console:

(process:7216): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_screen_get_font_options: assertion
`GDK_IS_SCREEN (screen)' failed


It seems to work, but no spell checking?


The flags are similar to as what I use elsewhere on x\86.

any ideas?


James

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


------=_Part_19752_14205637.1179372363916-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list