From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GBYf0-000389-0p for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:10:54 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7BF86q2023159; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:08:06 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7BF49JI026844 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:04:09 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCC864747 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05652-02 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:04:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FA964750 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:04:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GBYYE-000824-0T for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:03:54 +0200 Received: from dslb-084-061-133-046.pools.arcor-ip.net ([84.61.133.46]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:03:54 +0200 Received: from skoehler by dslb-084-061-133-046.pools.arcor-ip.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:03:54 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sven_K=F6hler?= Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Is the best solution still NIS+NFS? Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:03:24 +0200 Message-ID: References: <5bc4c4570608101436r4d14e54ei7c4b4b418064a782@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigAC95DAC0E13872B311C2BD52" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dslb-084-061-133-046.pools.arcor-ip.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) In-Reply-To: <5bc4c4570608101436r4d14e54ei7c4b4b418064a782@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: news X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.52 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.52 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 244b1693-ac77-4ad4-b735-0e9b38846287 X-Archives-Hash: f8753572d457cc77d94db5e8ed1ce9e6 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigAC95DAC0E13872B311C2BD52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > few years later I setup a environment which shares the /home using > NFS for the users and the authentication method was NIS. Is this still > the best solution? > My current environment is based on LDAP where all services use it. I > configured PAM+NSSwitch, Postfix, and so on. Now, I want linux client > workstations be authenticated remotely on my LDAP server and mount the > users home. What do you recommend? My university uses LDAP + AFS. AFS seems quite complicated though ... --------------enigAC95DAC0E13872B311C2BD52 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE3Jw87Ww7FjRBE4ARAtnqAKDYWyPsVKiRuYmh94e/5/GlPdnXlACgoJ8g c39Mx/QGK47eBRhCjB3f7J4= =o5AH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigAC95DAC0E13872B311C2BD52-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list