From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1DC2138239 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 19:59:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2EB36E0814; Sat, 29 May 2021 19:58:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail101c7.megamailservers.com (mail771.megamailservers.com [69.49.98.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF535E0788 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 19:58:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Authenticated-User: admin@sys-concept.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.com; s=mailtor; t=1622318335; bh=RtvSqDCX2fi9rAX3VBBje1gSrm755rdegDbZqk9xuRA=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ULX1ispj2B+ZqJ79MZ7D5IiBNZTaYTgvrHSmbMiITMPzku+QLg1CZmJfVb4mfStgt jgamZuMRib/ZpJtE5BzbZaD6LtreYvRHCusPeRdVsMZAi+4btyeCYhLIE0EB4NPhDy 0k1v2N56TLUwWsCJxvRP5HX0meelH/qPAGkqqcU4= Feedback-ID:thelma@sys-conc X-VIP: 69.49.109.100 Received: from [10.0.0.109] 184.69.242.18":"60125 ([184.69.242.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail101c7.megamailservers.com (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 14TJwrwJ019324 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 15:58:55 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] is "scp" reliable? To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <1eee5cf4-9234-07cf-4b83-7de431483d51@sys-concept.com> From: thelma@sys-concept.com Message-ID: Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 13:58:50 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1eee5cf4-9234-07cf-4b83-7de431483d51@sys-concept.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-CA Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A742F1A.60B29CFF.000E:SCFSTAT54230205,ss=1,re=-4.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: -4.000 X-CTCH-Rules: X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.3 cv=SeqJicZu c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=u3gW5Uk2xAGXuEgp5FffjQ==:117 a=u3gW5Uk2xAGXuEgp5FffjQ==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=046jbqsEAAAA:8 a=SON2BRWQXwFWsEufqKQA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=bGzDz6Hpkc7_N_b525It:22 X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean X-VADE-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdekledgudeggecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfjqffuvffqrffktedpqfgfvfdpvedtjeenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpehthhgvlhhmrgesshihshdqtghonhgtvghpthdrtghomhenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffkeeuffelvddvveefhffgffekuddvheefheetkefgudejhefgkeehffehkedttdenucfkphepudekgedrieelrddvgedvrddukeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpedukeegrdeiledrvdegvddrudekpdhhvghloheplgdutddrtddrtddruddtlegnpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhvghlmhgrsehshihsqdgtohhntggvphhtrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghgvnhhtohhoqdhushgvrheslhhishhtshdrghgvnhhtohhordhorhhg X-Origin-Country: CA X-Archives-Salt: 1a74826b-7ac9-4798-a4be-f74f1f35e2a4 X-Archives-Hash: 32e9d8c88dbd73d4a326824f8b6128a6 On 5/29/21 1:53 PM, thelma@sys-concept.com wrote: > I use "scp" to copy large file over local network, windows-7_pro.ova (about 28GB) but I it failed to import the appliance with VirtualBox. > Checking the md5sum of the source and destination it turn out they are different. > > Is "scp" reliable for large files? Even with "rsync" I get a different result. Source: md5sum windows-7_pro.ova 55073f564101274bc7cd609a25c21e5b destination: md5sum windows-7_pro.ova f5f3404cf1b0f654e873abe7e21e4328