From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-67528-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1II7J9-0000vu-Nf
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:28:00 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l76IQ1Qm025951;
Mon, 6 Aug 2007 18:26:01 GMT
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.226])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l76IGcbo013089
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 18:16:39 GMT
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h30so2807930wxd
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:16:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=dyICYbY3qHnMfR2eH0wpmeJiYbQEeljGGLX8MjO+YtRoEA/V3EQ5L9AZyH1U8FV12N6q3zeCMw6yMb68ZRuJgKlJBMV5d94u4OemhkLeaJ0GzL3AT7WsEdUPMME4BisDGB8IWCuy38JecEMqNduweN9EA6RhWZQVdNVSNGZW93o=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=BAraNQz1AOwpqB64d/cVRRTqNUUar1iO76EcIxQ/GCrR/wVXZlL8f44Y/CwMsNmNjjdnNpEMnNAO6BlOn+4UiiH3XLMGI6McMMozH3TOjUT0BGMV6INOE2hVIIiF+e4rGeGCNpcyQFfHvZciuG9fQ8YB/yiLMLHg6Wr9aZuMQHQ=
Received: by 10.90.119.15 with SMTP id r15mr5088418agc.1186424198893;
Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.90.78.4 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <e7260b6e0708061116u4df17c9fi31652c656c49462f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:16:38 -0500
From: Paul <stenius@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Excessive processor usage
In-Reply-To: <200708061909.11051.uwix@iway.na>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_85597_23940292.1186424198854"
References: <46B70B09.7010909@verizon.net>
<20070806162956.86822e02.hilse@web.de> <46B734DD.6060508@verizon.net>
<200708061909.11051.uwix@iway.na>
X-Archives-Salt: 180849d8-1237-46dd-9433-cc71a919b99e
X-Archives-Hash: e40bed0602f250d8457b652d3e98c75f
------=_Part_85597_23940292.1186424198854
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
so there is always an assumption
On 8/6/07, Uwe Thiem <uwix@iway.na> wrote:
>
> On 06 August 2007, sean wrote:
> > Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:30:01 +0200 "Xav'" <blackhawk@linuxant.fr>
> wrote:
> > >> If you want to check there is no such program on your system, I
> > >> advice you to try chkrootkit, to check there is no such rootkit on
> > >> your system...
> > >
> > > To put it correctly, since there is _NO_ way to assure that there
> isn't
> > > a rootkit:
> > >
> > > chkrootkit can be used to check whether there _are_ _known_ rootkits.
> > >
> > > BTW, there are other, similar programs that do the same.
> > > But my point is: You can never be sure, since a hypothesis can't be
> > > proven correct, just invalid.
> > >
> > > If there are indications a rootkit might be present, there's no secure
> > > way to remove it but to reinstall.
> > >
> > > -hwh
> >
> > Hans, Xav, Thank You both, ran the root kit check no problems.
>
> The problems remain: You can't be sure. :-(
>
> Uwe
>
> --
> Jack Nicholson: My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son of a
> bitch.
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
/
/
\ O /
\/_(
.__ / \
__\/ )
./ (
------=_Part_85597_23940292.1186424198854
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
so there is always an assumption<br><br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/6/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Uwe Thiem</b> <<a href="mailto:uwix@iway.na">uwix@iway.na</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">On 06 August 2007, sean wrote:<br>> Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:<br>> > Hi,<br>> ><br>> > On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:30:01 +0200 "Xav'" <
<a href="mailto:blackhawk@linuxant.fr">blackhawk@linuxant.fr</a>> wrote:<br>> >> If you want to check there is no such program on your system, I<br>> >> advice you to try chkrootkit, to check there is no such rootkit on
<br>> >> your system...<br>> ><br>> > To put it correctly, since there is _NO_ way to assure that there isn't<br>> > a rootkit:<br>> ><br>> > chkrootkit can be used to check whether there _are_ _known_ rootkits.
<br>> ><br>> > BTW, there are other, similar programs that do the same.<br>> > But my point is: You can never be sure, since a hypothesis can't be<br>> > proven correct, just invalid.<br>> >
<br>> > If there are indications a rootkit might be present, there's no secure<br>> > way to remove it but to reinstall.<br>> ><br>> > -hwh<br>><br>> Hans, Xav, Thank You both, ran the root kit check no problems.
<br><br>The problems remain: You can't be sure. :-(<br><br>Uwe<br><br>--<br>Jack Nicholson: My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son of a bitch.<br>--<br><a href="mailto:gentoo-user@gentoo.org">gentoo-user@gentoo.org
</a> mailing list<br><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br> /<br> /<br> \ O /<br> \/_(<br>.__ / \<br> __\/ )<br>./ (
------=_Part_85597_23940292.1186424198854--
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list