From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C28551382C5 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 13:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7029E0AEA; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 13:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm1-x330.google.com (mail-wm1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64E34E0AE0 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 13:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-x330.google.com with SMTP id g25so7431565wmh.1 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 05:33:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:references:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=ZBxWuQgefgTa8jVUR2BO80bRNLElIs75R2iasraly9w=; b=kzvma6VcrDeTlELitFL7D83inbrVApEv34h174XPCfusc3rxbpzIpSOLfAfIQrYXPv 9E20CpitU6opUdpJ/cbw16oQo1FV2zOL/kW49S+mu2x2TH1ZN/u2KNadV9PkTexJ2UHh umBp7bWtWjBasNO8C4o7NtFVLPV++3X54JQaqcOGp3SfP2CaUx60ARC/7YLOSmrrZCrW z7jdEYficKSW/OHDkPhEF6avDtsNOErcR3q+IZvja8IDEd9H+zid7vM5CNtIT4lvTdX+ JZKtxT6VV0T47R/bFHKo1jw/fNLKNpYrIUsLBmhSW/CsM3IZye8E64Zd9UEtwjVLzViY yCtw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:references:from:subject:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ZBxWuQgefgTa8jVUR2BO80bRNLElIs75R2iasraly9w=; b=MnPwvVODYq1ODcDz5mnwqOXOijMTVQ1xDiEfLNssQeyFn0RCZg1n8D4lSv+pt+TgLT A/VWX1dEG/381JJnyiG3JZnJMu8FENlkI89F0UzNcV3zyHGFKQjLO8fng7CDVNWLbSAX OtzrJHojd0ZTZ164tG2K4qU54rdWW8KjaAIl3VF4d98aPQBB4Q9vm5WO6Wn/FRnLEY/R QtAUgtKy2LL+jMPhRCeZndtvPF2vTXumUW/jZVUsKc8EOniYG4NXnmHYcEF6PXofnA9+ 92qFo39xwnrcIVIQNf9Wu7ykYoUYHiiUBGsjeO5DinDXbOgdpaxhXV4In3wQPpQj/YPK bdPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5311SWhNm1Q3H0m4MYcBGFI9cnQW3YX+PYsbfYNb2rH6hq55Rp0z 8T/1w6xDfS/t/ngX27E+V02RhRV7BS8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyWacKQwLutxhGmMMl15hmcISVF5FuChRElWnOe7Zld2I+xrjgF0GbFdOaHWp9WHhUZ1PDboQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2903:: with SMTP id i3mr22934296wmd.41.1607866412166; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 05:33:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.65] (cpc148898-sgyl44-2-0-cust663.18-2.cable.virginm.net. [82.34.182.152]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h16sm20717676wrq.29.2020.12.13.05.33.31 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 13 Dec 2020 05:33:31 -0800 (PST) To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <39170f4b-9baf-0b27-0e94-1404f7f2c0ec@sys-concept.com> <20201212224024.4a21d34a@digimed.co.uk> <54d95ce4-c388-bd2f-f157-342dc4d5db61@sys-concept.com> <69d87162-fe94-6647-7d05-2cad0b28f68d@gmail.com> <9b8cf567-8699-6f82-9eaf-83da02c1b456@sys-concept.com> From: Victor Ivanov Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] fsck.fat 4.1 - File system couldn't be fixed [SOLVED] Message-ID: Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 13:33:24 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9b8cf567-8699-6f82-9eaf-83da02c1b456@sys-concept.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ghd2kaw8pu2hq3mcAxD9wCQXbWtPncMrX" X-Archives-Salt: e8075732-1a06-400f-9881-47e2df57df5c X-Archives-Hash: 7ad5cd1b2586aeef5b22aa3dc8d079bb This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --ghd2kaw8pu2hq3mcAxD9wCQXbWtPncMrX Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="wwgV2CIbJLxZOZQJcawULDbqlBxnnFuJy"; protected-headers="v1" From: Victor Ivanov To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] fsck.fat 4.1 - File system couldn't be fixed [SOLVED] References: <39170f4b-9baf-0b27-0e94-1404f7f2c0ec@sys-concept.com> <20201212224024.4a21d34a@digimed.co.uk> <54d95ce4-c388-bd2f-f157-342dc4d5db61@sys-concept.com> <69d87162-fe94-6647-7d05-2cad0b28f68d@gmail.com> <9b8cf567-8699-6f82-9eaf-83da02c1b456@sys-concept.com> In-Reply-To: <9b8cf567-8699-6f82-9eaf-83da02c1b456@sys-concept.com> --wwgV2CIbJLxZOZQJcawULDbqlBxnnFuJy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 13/12/2020 07:42, thelma@sys-concept.com wrote: > I was following the Gentoo handbook, maybe I didn't read it correctly > and/or miss the information on alternative setting. I didn't see any > explanation that I need to have support for "fsck.fat". > I better stay away from any "vfat" format on boot partition, and I don'= t > see a reason to have initramfs (another complexity). >=20 No worries at all, despite my using Gentoo for the better part of a=20 decade I too sometimes do something silly without realising. And you're=20 right that this part of the guidebook could be improved to make some=20 clarifications. In any case, I've looked at the fstab on one of my machines and I do=20 have dump/pass set to "0 2" for the EFI partition (which is of course=20 vfat). I changed that to "1 2" to match your previous setup, though I=20 was sceptical if that would make any difference. I created a /forcefsck=20 file and managed to reboot just fine which suggests that either: 1) my ramdisk has fsck.fat bundled; or 2) was able to use the binary from the root partition after it was=20 mounted read-only [I could check explicitly, but I'm feeling a bit lazy] Out of curiosity, do you have the "sys-fs/dosfstools" package installed? This is the package that provides the fsck.fat binary. It's not a=20 dependency of commonly installed system packages so unless you install=20 it manually it's probably missing which might explain why fsck is=20 exiting with an error code. - Victor --wwgV2CIbJLxZOZQJcawULDbqlBxnnFuJy-- --ghd2kaw8pu2hq3mcAxD9wCQXbWtPncMrX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEKFZblUJabdsjGSQvxx0QR+MZjnMFAl/WGCQACgkQxx0QR+MZ jnM4FxAAsBLCccXnNeJ7qcWlXKKyqwKUyogvfTaLMULaPtUN6D6b2TOytOdW6q2B PAdCjjzYg2fnPVqp1PiQFBEtcKduMXL4zSr3XR7ijLysa6YkcKS0W9vthyO2J1nZ VPypsWpw+SnZzHO23oDnHlsmnaRR06SK9mIPqOyqaj3Dnwm8EklfPtcaEJuVSGn+ OcKdk8Ouu9NKFPMA1gfUNBatJOHmRa3wavenHO431oxE3NZVDQtgrMygw50sWome DvWRx1hLNdNUI9hjKluTa0fNX7cEEci+EySPw/Ss+6GgWU0O1WxzA6jQaqUPDVzv 7w7dhyY0UtQSpSDBD5hq7T0Yz13NExa/mppC5B1aAGwxCy+kw5c6PnBvIvSZspIp qhgWmXOGGuD6+9jde+Ifz1wljX4FZd/OPjLkf4G7LsUFFnylQN0if5A1rEhN8JhS M0WZ1WvjMNymYVRIK+nAurqcrm1WwbMX0A30Xo7xY+OKiaI00aGNZuPxiB9SwEHu 3mNc3DIYAaERjOG4S/YXdSgUTT5qQ5ELnY/oP2tFSyb3+eqScKpMWUDj3uBTt1Su yfdXiwR0jcuJT0+bwjLWpKECrN925ASaTnqFgH5drhz1XKJe0pLMGWUKKVuF5x1D Z20cvO8JZM6aL7HReu0Iv2b62eS5cuAt9ohbyt8aDPheY+G95q0= =AnKn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ghd2kaw8pu2hq3mcAxD9wCQXbWtPncMrX--