From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FOnMq-0007hg-3W for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 02:58:36 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k2U2vnsu024219; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 02:57:49 GMT Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.202]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2U2rLjc017879 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 02:53:22 GMT Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z31so327714nzd for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:53:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IroqifHiF9itNJ6M6wlGHDitbrpM0ZHVv9Opqiv1bEit7p61h6WzmbqF8Fwkm+/ySUPecYJR52eNLEi6lhDWe6Ju89lQQeSsDFpcNTSZz9p3SEZ8m4211KQGN3eI5k85tFwgKfB1jBf8TqKZZ+WI++Fvv9yDjCq3szHWfd7JBoo= Received: by 10.37.2.45 with SMTP id e45mr1893339nzi; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:53:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.154.3 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:53:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:53:19 -0800 From: "Lord Sauron" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [gentoo-user] Intel Core Duo Processor - Anyone? In-Reply-To: <1143685456.19064.36.camel@neuromancer.home.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline References: <1143616641.29453.15.camel@neuromancer.home.net> <7573e9640603282355t7ab5a526tfd619e0c9c45a03@mail.gmail.com> <1143646905.21205.31.camel@neuromancer.home.net> <7573e9640603290845h3bedb131m209cc6323aee5848@mail.gmail.com> <7573e9640603291228s93d3dc4o64edfe2adef0aa54@mail.gmail.com> <1143682552.19064.26.camel@neuromancer.home.net> <1143685456.19064.36.camel@neuromancer.home.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id k2U2rLjc017879 X-Archives-Salt: 6a421622-353a-45a7-8330-f40554982bf3 X-Archives-Hash: efb243f69f53a1ca937de18f1724b858 On 3/29/06, Ow Mun Heng wrote: > On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 17:41 -0800, Lord Sauron wrote: > > On 3/29/06, Ow Mun Heng wrote: > > > > Yeah, however, I see all these people buy a cheap laptop from Dell and > > > > expect it to run stuff like Doom 3. > > > > > /me hates those built-in graphics. Makes things slow. > > > Seriously does make a difference. > > > > However, at the same time, you really shouldn't expect games out of > > any but the most expensive laptops. Maybe 5-10 years from now that'll > > I'm not even talking about playing games. I'm just talking about graphic > rendering. eg: Desktop Wallpaper rendering/eye candy. Well, I can understand if a lot of eyekandy won't work... yeah, I guess you're right. My laptop's GC works slower than a older GC that was in a desktop. > My wife's home desktop is a Dell w/ 768MB Ram, 2,8Ghz P4 and integrated > graphics. It runs slower (feel) than my laptop which has discrete > graphics. Poor woman... having to use a Dell ; ) > > > If you're not concerned with battery nor weight. I suggest you go for > > > the Dell XPS Mobile concept (when it becomes available) > > >> Here are some shots. > > > > That's not so much a laptop as a new breed of ultraportable desktop, IMHO. > > heh.. I like that. Ultraportable desktop. -- ========== GCv3.12 ========== GCS d-(++) s+: a? C++ UL+>++++ P+ L++ E--- W+(+++) N++ o? K? w--- O? M+ V? PS- PE+ Y-(--) PGP- t+++ 5? X R tv-- b+ DI+++ D+ G e* h- !r !y ========= END GCv3.12 ======== -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list