From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA2E0138334 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 21:33:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EFC98E086A; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 21:33:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sonic302-4.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com (sonic302-4.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com [74.6.135.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88FB8E083D for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 21:33:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1534800785; bh=vYZtTt/5F6F2q3rld40Sz+hYsN7vu2W/wV5L3a+W0Iw=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=FRHK6mYEYSYuZDykbOjiN7z+PJtMM9scpZFaurJCVPvfo4hAfwN3ixy4YeDdJX97OjifPn4TSUZbnzfPwSKx3t3VQajaVojkLOkbq7gmVC1xJqT50kR+qdNbChIMd6q5SrrQTOVxYKTQ05KHcYm0KrYpMk68ddwrBR6v0fQhifK8FhJRU6pd336fF72aQFeoHzrb96c5wc6hjQIvq4ZC0mGrty/ADYSrApSLs7wKoID/CiBJRm+iLedW3lj641WU7nac9h12Diq5YZqnUu0sm7tS2mLJeHjXkgtzUEHlss4JZpuybgjtBFRP2NbqeVYEnnzVDQmSMRCsJlR81T+uRw== X-YMail-OSG: yQ4dBGgVM1ln.PLzjSdl.56ckLtCiNur4mxfisY0qyQACVh0cJuegRlpm6ygwAO b4OuERaGkHdElwLUeAjXV3X1Zk6dgFfLY8sOdVncIspGKZ0jaC.7Uv18XWW.Kk0dZSmTgzq1R7CX 2xO12EyLGWkR_BohdMeuC6Qk_t.OQZGHELsVTc0wZgCClxvW6LwCAvqDWN5I_xW_SI6__jjOUbo_ 449rqiXybTgqtDfHtdXhEWUNobQmEdHXMi7FwZQr27a6nc_L2712S_dgUYWMdsElE6UzwwLesfXf KTS9OTXOYrNgOBVwTyhktnWm_Hq6wH8QT8NnwMcC9EqCx_753rkH8L4SQoM49ns6_bYAWEC2DvZN 38YgntlPsM3_RO_.ECGHshWO6T60mWiChRzTHz2yTA2p4uNruVUUHgToatDfsvJqjdODMQxmlELp tPBxs05hPwE8GBoClshannSN0daFv9b28B0NNfhPr4VnNiZFNglR1ZOi7eqi0qKAbL_gXwBoAkfF j0MGyUnHoTMFS87D5kO.6v4p.KYfsCAHRqLLASIFSq1Gl5JwXE4pMOSt6h8F.X1aaTEa2TsIcbh1 gUE8tCGngJPriRYJA1MzztwLuYebwVzr.PNWV7OSLbJnnfATNZxMatBzoi.zk28Ga4HHWf9m4cDY W3DaNswfzowr_AgGn_m3tMDKywPbf51Q90qc0.YPC9KG7N8QNfARgaBDlg6u3WlqMhoTT_.LvjiV 0YqXS8x5nqM26aaIXQJCJspioFz26p8cJqdhCgW8KjZE_DVyLqjt2aTR0UIsQYBbUGB9zHr8ZAMD o65noHphuupde7k7Ky22oPA2HyMBqvGLrk5mEzh5Xv7nNHpzThwUazmjmZPKvKZ2KFKLzS_1gkcD iIeQ6qbY2ilU5PmLNJ.wUzDTe2It1NYVg8QMBSwJmaFgsH4uR3QLhqbrebHicS3hVQ0piLizhNxe eDWaqUALo6dVw5nNAIigh1XllUVt81z9gdRQHkNx0IJ1K3cHf9xYdWBoatTerNpLp6pjKiiVxqi7 aAs7pWRPhhcAAi4Fs Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic302.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 21:33:05 +0000 Received: from 072-185-251-010.res.spectrum.com (EHLO [192.168.1.52]) ([72.185.251.10]) by smtp416.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 7945f9fc69b5c6cd2e4b4e01d2926532; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 21:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OT: latest longterm kernel.org patches are unsigned To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <20180817160712.mlopxb7xpx6ny6qu@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> From: james Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 17:33:03 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180817160712.mlopxb7xpx6ny6qu@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 3c13356a-3b93-44e7-9bbb-68f10ed2ac82 X-Archives-Hash: d17d3bcf0ca2c6b0ded19e6276a28d5c On 8/17/18 12:07 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > If you browse this URL: > > https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ > > you'll see that for each 4.14 patch up to 4.14.58 there is a > cooresponding GPG signature file: > > patch-4.14.58.sign 25-Jul-2018 09:28 833 > patch-4.14.58.xz 25-Jul-2018 09:28 1M > > etc. > > But starting with 4.14.59, there are no .sign files. Why? Is this a > bug, and if so, where do I report it? > > This breaks my lovingly duct-taped kernel update infrastructure ... > Ian, Not sure this is related to your problem but it's an interesting read about (intel) microcodes and current blocks being enforced by Gentoo, clandestinely? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906158 https://bugs.gentoo.org/664134 Apologies if I research is fragmented or flawed... hth, James