From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28681138334 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2018 05:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 582EBE0E17; Sun, 18 Nov 2018 05:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net (tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net [IPv6:2600:3c00:e000:1e9::8849]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3FF9E0E04 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2018 05:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Contact-TNet-Consulting-Abuse-for-assistance by tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPSA id wAI5j2nN002433 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 23:45:04 -0600 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Help with dev-util/cargo blocking dev-lang/rust. To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <7a28f836-f2fe-a15b-0d51-ca2fb5fc5fac@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> <3098427F-0251-44D7-A5D2-1DAEADB9A95A@gmail.com> <08a81df7-9d63-b074-8ee5-cdbf7b809377@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> <4fb457e8-95f0-cd05-7243-28beb20db187@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> <9c01349e-3ddd-7774-5732-2a637682e96c@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> From: Grant Taylor Organization: TNet Consulting Message-ID: Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 22:46:10 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 423ffe28-222b-4dc7-94d7-47e32b215a4d X-Archives-Hash: 6c644dfc3007f2b9417530b6df35d402 On 11/17/2018 10:33 PM, Andrew Udvare wrote: > I switched fully to ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64" (make.conf) after running > mixed for a while. These kinds of issues come up too often and I don't > have a lot of time to solve them, plus for my dev machine I just don't > notice stable vs unstable most of the time. If something is truly unstable > from my own experience I will mask that version and downgrade. I've occasionally thought about doing that. I've just not pulled the trigger on that yet. I think I added ~amd64 to ACCEPT_KEYWORDS and looked at how many packages were going to change, got busy / needed to do something else at the time, and reverted with the decision to tackle it some other day. That day hasn't come yet. > My recommendation would be to switch over to ~amd64 for a workstation > generally. On my home server I run stable with a few unmasks, but most > of the time these are packages that have no dependencies. ACK Thank you for sharing your experience, your opinion, and your help. -- Grant. . . . unix || die