From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-85671-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1KvKWS-0002FO-0Y
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:32:20 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E485E034D;
Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:32:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.235])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1DB2E034D
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:32:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g9so3779709rvb.4
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
bh=08gu39ota4R31Fq7eHlP5JSlq1VsKIDWgLeGIcp6fP4=;
b=T9KxHsg6chxjaILpf1XWy3qrBhymo72Td4LnG4AuuXGB5BgNINMllZB7KO8jGjcUjR
OYWGdKIKaSOgueV5SrG85LWb6YfWOxwfdZoGZsztKUDtnc0G/AsAAIwMpsUUuIp3b6iC
t03LSk6sYLSprgcXXmsxNnEfY+TLD9ZPFnptc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
:references;
b=iP1jiEahzW2D0g0nJqvOvIUDy7Qeo14oILL+bgjD4Qndvqy6F06vJHYwOC/vY9dAmR
TE8TOS9ENily6ndaMQmDT7Df1ThBkbUGTPujOzkghTl3UdOE724Xrn2psv8QEJAo0oxn
olcdHv7klM607Vd7JsqbhYqOtLAmxVkgHvPg0=
Received: by 10.142.214.11 with SMTP id m11mr4295131wfg.69.1225323137408;
Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.143.40.6 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <e38d12ff0810291632gde628e5p5edadfc87f2704a8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:32:17 -0400
From: "Andrey Vul" <andrey.vul@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A question about emerge --info
In-Reply-To: <350fc7cf0810291623j5fb5608rf311cd0d2a371d2a@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <58965d8a0810291553x50e4068ehc58834dfdbce285b@mail.gmail.com>
<350fc7cf0810291609v335f4909nbcd90ab7d368cb5d@mail.gmail.com>
<e38d12ff0810291613t6205b80em1294991c930ce1cf@mail.gmail.com>
<350fc7cf0810291623j5fb5608rf311cd0d2a371d2a@mail.gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 7de84ea8-f980-4cf8-9e10-abf7ef5cc3e6
X-Archives-Hash: b9ab841bd1ad7f80a663a8a6b2587b17
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Andrey Falko <ma3oxuct@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Andrey Vul <andrey.vul@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Andrey Falko <ma3oxuct@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Paul Hartman
>> > <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I've always been curious about something in emerge --info's output:
>> >>
>> >> $ emerge --info
>> >> Portage 2.2_rc12 (default/linux/amd64/2008.0/desktop, gcc-4.3.2,
>> >> glibc-2.8_p20080602-r0, 2.6.27-gentoo-r1 x86_64)
>> >> =================================================================
>> >> System uname:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Linux-2.6.27-gentoo-r1-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-2_CPU_6600_@_2.40GHz-with-glibc2.2.5
>> >> Timestamp of tree: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:31:02 +0000
>> >>
>> >> Why does it show the glibc-2.8 on the second line but glibc2.2.5 on the
>> >> fifth?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Paul
>> >>
>> >
>> > My best guess is that your kernel was compiled by a toolchain that was
>> > running on glibc2.2.5
>> >
>> > See what happens if you recompile the kernel under the newer toolchain.
>> >
>> 2.6.27 uses glibc? Really?
>> I'm asking lkml what's happening.
>>
>>
> Well it doesn't use glibc per se, gcc uses the glibc.....however, his uname
> -a output does look funky.
My point exactly.
> Here is mine: System uname: 2.6.24.7 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6700 @
> 2.66GHz
>
> Did all underscores make it there by accident? What happens when you do a
> plain uname -a?
Here's my uname -a: Linux andrey 2.6.26.5-rt9 #6 PREEMPT RT Mon Oct 20
18:21:31 EDT 2008 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1700+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
But emerge --info | grep uname is this: System uname:
Linux-2.6.26.5-rt9-i686-AMD_Athlon-tm-_XP_1700+-with-glibc2.0
Clearly, the underscores and -with-glibc are part of portage 2.2_rc12.
I'm going to scan through the portage _rc12.patch diff to see what's
going on.
Will report when finished.
--
Andrey Vul
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?