From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-85667-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1KvKEi-0000vO-Up
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:14:01 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69E1BE01D0;
	Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:13:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.169])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A961E01D0
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:13:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 29so243153wff.10
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
         :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=F/lhxdzOBBiE7xN0hN1u3W1FP9MwVdrX9r+utTyK2sc=;
        b=L6La7QkBqSlpIWm5iom40DMJY6EvhrZok2LTdzakrLBowslmZqtpAeB7QRm07z2GTM
         Ks12QkYs43mp5cyCFOgqHlmez1cnMqTGIU/thXSJ1trwadbmmornOfZOkJi58HLtCT4x
         xtSAJ2N4dkSqp1QSuT03F5kVILIobwE6TXO40=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=xwO357gNYAI9h6p4zJSfCgSoMwip6qRaFVPiJL/5Y3Ah1FgqdpQ/OTvvK72TBjU2ef
         3mkwQZQZL4Ph2HOtl9dDZD++qDoLnbGIfphnG96nhUCiKNeqCnq3HpTJcHPLIL2mtbtb
         Zq4S/ZUYlr41zvW4UEoIU9MiNOqNGw6H1Mxow=
Received: by 10.142.143.14 with SMTP id q14mr4259018wfd.304.1225322037623;
        Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.143.40.6 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <e38d12ff0810291613t6205b80em1294991c930ce1cf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:13:57 -0400
From: "Andrey Vul" <andrey.vul@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A question about emerge --info
In-Reply-To: <350fc7cf0810291609v335f4909nbcd90ab7d368cb5d@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <58965d8a0810291553x50e4068ehc58834dfdbce285b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <350fc7cf0810291609v335f4909nbcd90ab7d368cb5d@mail.gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: afd8a9f2-d284-4335-906a-a245de145e64
X-Archives-Hash: 84ac3e579cecd513e692e6b3da148b9f

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Andrey Falko <ma3oxuct@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Paul Hartman
> <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've always been curious about something in emerge --info's output:
>>
>> $ emerge --info
>> Portage 2.2_rc12 (default/linux/amd64/2008.0/desktop, gcc-4.3.2,
>> glibc-2.8_p20080602-r0, 2.6.27-gentoo-r1 x86_64)
>> =================================================================
>> System uname:
>>
>> Linux-2.6.27-gentoo-r1-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-2_CPU_6600_@_2.40GHz-with-glibc2.2.5
>> Timestamp of tree: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:31:02 +0000
>>
>> Why does it show the glibc-2.8 on the second line but glibc2.2.5 on the
>> fifth?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Paul
>>
>
> My best guess is that your kernel was compiled by a toolchain that was
> running on glibc2.2.5
>
> See what happens if you recompile the kernel under the newer toolchain.
>
2.6.27 uses glibc? Really?
I'm asking lkml what's happening.


-- 
Andrey Vul

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?